²é¿´: 504  |  »Ø¸´: 1

k86475586

Í­³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)

[ÇóÖú] Çó´óÉñ·­Ò룬×ÖÆª¶à£¡£¡£¡

Recently, a substitute and recycle energy is an
imperative issue all over the world. Nuclear energy
becomes a highlight again because of its high and stable
electric output. However, nuclear energy has been
suspended in the past decade because it was filled with
fear and anxiety due to nuclear accidents and safety
treatments or disposal of high-level radioactive waste.
Global warming effect caused by CO2 compels us to
face the problem of consuming fossil fuels, including
petroleum, coal, and gas during the past several decades.
There are three operating nuclear power plants in
Taiwan and one is under construction and is expected to
be put into operation in 2010. For long-term
performance assessment of radioactive waste
repositories, it is necessary to deal with their problems
today because of its long half-life and to hinder the
possible transport of radionuclides into the environment.
The deep geological disposal is the best way to solve the
recent problem in the world and Taiwan Power
Company (TPC) proposed a long-term disposal project
for the high level waste (HLW) several years ago. In
addition, the multi-barrier concept was adapted to
overcome the disposal difficulties of HLW into
geological formations. Therefore, it is imperative to
investigate the migration of radionuclides in the host
rocks (i.e., granite). Some relating results have been
presented in the literature1,2 for assessing the long-term
performance of radioactive waste repositories.
The batch tests are the most popular and convenient
method in the laboratory, for the estimation of the
retardation of radionuclides in geological environment.
However, the applicability of batch tests has been
discussed and criticized as the advancement of
technology has relaxed the aforementioned
limitations.3,4 It was recognized that the distribution
coefficients (Kd) of batch techniques are too simple to
represent the reaction system of interest in many cases.
However, it was found that the diffusion techniques that
are frequently used, gives more accurate information
about the radionuclides in deep geology.5,6 Some
literatures7¨C9 have discussed the advantages and
disadvantages of Kd and Rf obtained by the two
methods. Generally, all experimental results showed that
the Kd values derived from the diffusion tests are more
accurate to evaluate the transport of radionuclides in
compacted media than those obtained from batch
experiments. However, most Kd values are acquired by
the batch method because of its simplicity and
convenience in the experiment.
This paper is an extension of our previous papers,
where the sorption of individual and coupling Cs and Se
in crushed mudrock was studied. The experimental
results10,11 showed that the Kd value of Se is higher than
that of Cs derived from the batch method. The sorption
of Cs is different from that of Se as the results of
individual and coupling Cs and Se experiments show
because the sorption mechanisms are different. In this
study, through-diffusion columns were adopted and
analyzed by compacted mudrocks. In addition, CRANK12
stated that the steady state of diffusion is achieved when
the dimensionless parameter:  £¨¹«Ê½²»Ó÷­Ò룩is larger than 0.45. According to the accumulated
breakthrough curves,12 the apparent and effective diffusion coeffiecients (Da and De) could be calculated
by the slope and intercept of the breakthrough curve.12
Besides, a non-reactive radionuclide, HTO, was initially
used in the diffusion experiments for assessing the
ability of radionuclide retardation. It was more suitable
to compare the retardation factor obtained from a nonreactive
radiotracer (HTO) than from CRANK¡¯s method
for evaluating the retardation of radionuclides.
Therefore, HTO was used before cesium in throughdiffusion
tests in order to obtain the distribution
coefficients (Kd) and retardation factor (Rf) of Cs and
Se. Synthetic groundwater (GW) was used in this work
to reflect the extreme situation that the highly reducing
groundwater might intrude into the repositories
underground 400 m. The results of both experiments are
compared and discussed in this study.
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

Luse_91

гæ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû

¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
RXMCDM: ½ð±Ò+1, ¶àлӦÖú£¡ 2014-06-21 17:14:02
k86475586: ½ð±Ò+8, ¡ïÓаïÖú 2014-06-21 18:26:12
½üÀ´£¬Ñ°ÕÒÒ»¸öÌæ´úÆ·ºÍ¿ÉÔÙÉúµÄÄÜÔ´ÊÇÈ«ÊÀ½ç±ØÐë×ÅÖØ¿¼ÂǵÄÎÊÌâ¡£ºËÄÜÔٴγÉÎªÖØÍ·Ï·£¬ÒòΪËüµÄ¸æ¸ßÄܺÍÎȶ¨µÄµçÊä³ö¡£È»¶ø£¬ÔÚ¹ýȥʮÄêºËÄܱ»ÔÝ»ºÒòΪËüÊÇÁîÈ˿־åºÍ½¹Âǵģ¬ÓÉÓÚºËʹʺͰ²È«´¦Àí»òÊǸßˮƽµÄ·ÅÉä·ÏÆúÎïµÄ´¦Àí¡£
ÎÂÊÒЧӦǿÆÈÎÒÃÇÈ¥ÃæÁÙ»¯Ê¯È¼ÁϵÄÏûºÄÎÊÌ⣬°üÀ¨Ê¯ÓÍ¡¢ÃººÍÃºÆøÔÚ¹ýÈ¥µÄ¼¸Ê®Äê¡£
ÔŲ́ÍåÓÐÈý¸öÕýÔÚÔË×÷µÄºËµçÕ¾£¬Ò»¸öÔÚ½¨ÉèÖÐÒ»¸öÔ¤¼Æ2010ÄêͶÈëʹÓá£
¶ÔÓÚ³¤ÆÚµÄºË·ÏÆúÎï²Ö¿âµÄÐÔÄÜÆÀ¹À£¬ÏÖ½ñ´¦ÀíËûÃǵÄÎÊÌâÊǷdz£µÄ±ØÒªÒòΪËüºÜ³¤µÄ°ëË¥ÆÚ²¢ÇÒ×éÖ¯·ÅÉäÐÔÍ¬Î»ËØÊͷŵ¹»·¾³ÖС£
ÉîµØ²ã´¦ÀíÊÇÏÖ½ñÊÀ½çÉϽâ¾öÕâ¸öÎÊÌâ×îºÃµÄ·½·¨£¬²¢ÇÒ¼¸Äêǰ̨ÍåµçÁ¦¹«Ë¾Õë¶Ô¸ß·ÅÉä·ÏÆúÎïÌáÒéÁËÒ»¸ö³¤ÆÚµÄ´¦ÀíÏîÄ¿¡£
ÁíÍ⣬¶àÖØÕϰ­µÄ¸ÅÄîÊDZ»ÓÃÓÚ¿Ë·þÁËHLW½øÈëµØÖʲã×éµÄÄÑÌâ¡£
Òò´Ë£¬Ñо¿·ÅÉäÐÔÍ¬Î»ËØÔÚÖ÷ÑÒÖеÄ×ªÒÆÊǷdz£±ØÒª¡£


·­Òë²»ÏÂÈ¥ÁË£¬Õâô³¤£¬½ð±ÒÓÖÊÇÄÇôµã¶ù£¡
ÄîÖ»ÄîÄÇÏàÓöµÄһ˲¼äΪÄã°Ñʱ¿Õ´©Ô½Ô¹ÄªÔ¹Õ⺬ÀáµÄһ˫ÑÛתÑÛ¼ä²×º£É£ÌïÄîµÄÔ¹µÄ¶¼Ëµ°®ÊÇ×Ô¼ºµÄÐÅÄî·­ÔÆÊÖÊÖÖÐÔ¾ÛÁËÉ¢Á˲ÅÖªÔµÊÇ·²ÐÄÒ»µã
2Â¥2014-06-21 15:22:39
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ k86475586 µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085601²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶Çóµ÷¼Á +10 Ľº®mio 2026-03-16 10/500 2026-03-19 15:26 by ¶¡¶¡*
[¿¼ÑÐ] 304Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ÂüÊâ2266 2026-03-18 3/150 2026-03-19 14:42 by peike
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤µ÷¼Á 324·Ö +10 llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 12/600 2026-03-19 14:33 by llllkkkhh
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á£¬Çó¸÷λÀÏʦÊÕÁô +10 ÇïÓÐľ±± 2026-03-14 10/500 2026-03-19 05:52 by anny19840123
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖпƼ¼´óѧ£¬080502£¬354·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +4 ÊØºòϦÑôCF 2026-03-18 4/200 2026-03-18 22:16 by li123456789.
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤ +5 °²È«Éϰ¶£¡ 2026-03-16 5/250 2026-03-18 15:33 by cmz0325
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0703»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á +3 ÄÝÄÝninicgb 2026-03-17 3/150 2026-03-18 10:29 by macy2011
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÉúÎïѧ071000 329·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +3 ÎÒ°®ÉúÎïÉúÎﰮΠ2026-03-17 3/150 2026-03-18 10:12 by macy2011
[¿¼ÑÐ] 326Çóµ÷¼Á +5 Éϰ¶µÄСÆÏ 2026-03-15 6/300 2026-03-17 17:26 by ruiyingmiao
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÓÐûÓеÀÌú/ÍÁľµÄÏëµ÷¼ÁÄÏÁÖ£¬¸ø×Ô¼ºÕÐʦµÜÖС« +3 TqlXswl 2026-03-16 7/350 2026-03-17 15:23 by TqlXswl
[¿¼ÑÐ] ҩѧ383 Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ҩѧchy 2026-03-15 4/200 2026-03-16 20:51 by Ôª×Ó^0^
[¿¼ÑÐ] »úеר˶325£¬Ñ°ÕÒµ÷¼ÁԺУ +3 y9999 2026-03-15 5/250 2026-03-16 19:58 by y9999
[¿¼ÑÐ] 326Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ŵ±´¶û»¯Ñ§½±êéê 2026-03-15 7/350 2026-03-16 17:11 by ŵ±´¶û»¯Ñ§½±êéê
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085600µ÷¼Á +5 ÑúÑú123sun 2026-03-12 6/300 2026-03-16 15:58 by ÑúÑú123sun
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÇóÀÏʦÊÕÁôµ÷¼Á +4 jiang½ª66 2026-03-14 5/250 2026-03-15 20:11 by Winj1e
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¹þ¹¤´ó²ÄÁÏ324·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +5 ãÆÐñ¶« 2026-03-14 5/250 2026-03-14 14:53 by ľ¹Ï¸à
[¿¼ÑÐ] 330Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ?½´¸øµ÷¼Á¹òÁË 2026-03-13 3/150 2026-03-14 10:13 by JourneyLucky
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÕÐÊÕ0805£¨²ÄÁÏ£©µ÷¼Á +3 18595523086 2026-03-13 3/150 2026-03-14 00:33 by 123%¡¢
[¿¼ÑÐ] 311Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ¶¬Ê®Èý 2026-03-13 3/150 2026-03-13 20:41 by JourneyLucky
[¿¼ÑÐ] 333Çóµ÷¼Á +3 152697 2026-03-12 4/200 2026-03-13 07:08 by Iveryant
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û