24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 925  |  回复: 2
本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ahhnds1978

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 能否帮看一下这个EL的审稿意见?

各位高手,昨天收到了EL的审稿意见,发现没有具体的修改意见,能否帮看看我如何修改才好?谢谢!
Engineering Letters

Paper No.: EL_2014_04_08b
Paper Title: Research on Pre-identification and Real Time Early Warning of Coal and Gas Outbursts

Ratings: 5=excellent, 4=good, 3=average, 2=poor, 1= unacceptable

1.        Content
Technical quality (1-5)     :  [  4  ]
Technical originality (1-5) :  [  4  ]

2.        Presentation
Overall format (1-5)             :  [  3  ]
Abstract (1-5)                   :  [  3  ]
Figures and tables clarity (1-5) :  [  3  ]
English (1-5)                    :  [  3  ]

3.        Recommendation (tick one)
Accept                                 :  [    ]
Accept with minor revision             :  [    ]
Accept with major revision             :  [  x  ]
Recommend for IAENG conference instead :  [  x  ]
Reject                                 :  [    ]

4.        Brief summary and further comments for the author(s) if any for improvement of the paper.
(Use a separate sheet if necessary)

The results are not significant enough for journal publication yet.
Much more comprehensive evaluations are needed for journal publication.
The authors need to further improve the technical writing and presentation of the paper.
Additional suggestion: It would be desirable if the authors can cite some updated references so that the readers
can see current trends of the broad domain. Some open-access journals, which provide full article contents free
of charge, may be helpful for updating the references with the current trends, like for example:
https://www.engineeringletters.com/current_issue.html
https://www.iaeng.org/IJCS/current_issue.html
https://www.iaeng.org/IJAM/current_issue.html

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

phu_grassman

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

快乐岛、布吉岛岛主

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

除一楼的,楼主还得注意“more comprehensive evaluations”更为全面深入的分析评估,以及“technical writing”写作水平也有待提高。
3楼2014-06-13 13:42:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 3 个回答

reko34

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ahhnds1978: 金币+5, 翻译EPI+1, 有帮助 2014-06-13 09:15:47
技术水平的打分都比写作高,后面就说了要改进写作,没有具体要点。建议就一条,多引用近期的论文,推荐了几个开源的给你作参考。
2楼2014-06-13 09:07:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见