24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 5311  |  回复: 33
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

guoluan

木虫 (小有名气)

蝈蝈

[求助] 审稿人是major revision,但是Materials Letters拒稿 已有16人参与

Materials Letters拒稿,状态是Completed - Reject
但是审稿人的意见是:major revision required for publication

意思好像是大修??
修改后重投就可以发表??
但是编辑直接给拒稿了,我能不能按照这个修改意见修改后重投呢??
还是跟编辑argue呢??

具体信息如下:

Dear XX,
Thank you for submitting the above paper.
We have now received comments on your paper and regret to say that we must turn this paper down.
For your guidance, comments from the review/s are appended below.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. We will be happy to receive other contributions from you.
Yours sincerely,
Prof. Iwan Kityk
Editor
Materials Letters

Editor's/Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: REFEREE'S REPORT  。。。。。。
Title: 。。。。。。
Decision: major revision required for publication
Graphical Abstract:
The graphical abstract of the paper should be improved by combining the two figures as one schematic diagram to really show the relation of what benefits the material synthesis and the importance this study can be provided.
Comments:
The paper contains the original results on 。。。。。。Despite the text discussion, I suggest a major revision of the technical results of the paper before it to be published. The remarks are addressed in the following.
Remarks,
1.     The structure characteristic of the sample:
。。。。。。
2.     Subtraction of Si substrate signal from the Raman spectrum is strongly recommended.
。。。。。。
3.     The scale bars in the SEM images are not clear enough.
。。。。。。
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

星雨湖畔

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
12楼: Originally posted by dong1059 at 2014-05-26 09:13:48
首先,我想说的是,我不知道你大师兄的文章是什么时候的事情,但是近年来,Materials Letters审稿时就遵循这个原则,大修等于拒稿,审稿系统里明确写的;其次,你可以去期刊点评里看看,一般这个期刊绝大部分都是直 ...

嗯,我只是陈述一个事实,绝无他意,他的文章去年年底接受的,今年见刊的哈

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
做最好的自己,实干才是硬道理
13楼2014-05-26 09:21:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 34 个回答

brucefan

专家顾问 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
guoluan: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助 2014-05-26 09:34:19
被编辑拒绝了几乎是没戏了。编辑才是决定者,审稿意见只做参考。改投其它期刊吧。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2014-05-25 21:15:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

glassman782

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
Bluekingdom: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2014-05-26 19:54:52
材料快报的大修是等同拒稿的。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2014-05-25 21:46:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dong1059

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
guoluan: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2014-05-26 09:34:29
3楼说的对。我给该期刊审过稿子,其大修等于拒稿。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
4楼2014-05-25 23:41:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见