| 查看: 14667 | 回复: 30 | ||
[求助]
投IEEE TVT,六周状态就变成了“Awaiting Editor Review”,是不是凶多吉少? 已有7人参与
|
||
|
各位投过/中过IEEE TVT的大虾们请进来帮忙看一下,我这种情况是不是杯具了? 4月1号投的IEEE TVT,类型是regular paper; 投完之后显示的是等待分配责编,“Awaiting AE assignment”; 4月9号左右变成了审理中,“Under Review”; 没两天,4月11号左右变成了责编处理,“With Associate Editor”; 这个状态一直不变,直到今天,5月15日,变成了等待主编定夺,“Awaiting Editor Review”。 也就是差不多五周的时间内,三个审稿人的意见就返回了?也就是说,我的投稿在六周时间内就出一审结果了? 咨询了一下我的导师,他觉得这篇文章凶多吉少。 我好伤心啊,这篇文章花了很多时间,写得多认真的,个人认为远比本人之前投中的两篇SCI期刊论文水平高啊。满心希望可以中TVT,谁知现在迎来了杯具的前奏。 请问各位有经验的筒子,照目前的情况,我还有哪怕一丁点儿投中的可能么?有没有人也遇到过,审稿周期不到两个月就返回意见,并且是好的结果的? 谢谢大家![泪目] |
» 猜你喜欢
回收溶剂求助
已经有7人回复
职称评审没过,求安慰
已经有40人回复
硝基苯如何除去
已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有17人回复
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志,到最后选publishing options时页面空白,不能完成投稿
已经有22人回复
申请26博士
已经有5人回复
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
毕业后当辅导员了,天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
求助文献
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
再见陆嘉莹: 回帖置顶 2014-05-16 14:46:08
|
感谢各位虫友对我的安慰和鼓励,很遗憾地告诉大家,我这篇4月1号投递的IEEE TVT的稿件,5月16号被rejected了。个人认为这篇文章的idea是比较有趣了,在写作过程中也得到了高年级牛人的指导,可惜时不我与,没能被接收。编辑决定信和三位审稿人的审稿意见我在这里贴出来,供可能需要看的朋友们参考: Dear Dr. XX: The review of paper VT-2014-XXXX: XXXXXXXX has been completed. Attached below please find the reviewers' comments. After careful consideration of the reviewers' comments, the decision has been made not to publish this paper in the IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. Please note that we do not accept submissions of a revised manuscript based on this rejected paper. We are aware that there is the inherent possibility of wrong decisions in any review process. However, we hope you will understand that, in fairness to all authors and reviewers, reject decisions are considered to be final decisions. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the TRANSACTIONS. We look forward to the possibility of receiving more submissions on your future technical work. Sincerely yours, Prof. XXX Editor, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology Reviewer: 1 The paper describes an ad-hoc beamforming adaptation method for massive MIMO. While the method is technically effective, this reviewer considers that the analysis is minimal and that the paper will not be of sufficient value for the TVT readership. Effective adaptive technique, perhaps of interest to the industry The paper is written fairly well (although there is a huge space on page 7) Reviewer: 2 This paper is on beamforming for large-scale MIMO communication systems for high speed railway. There are some issues the authors need to address before possible publication in TVT. The authors are encourage to revise the paper and submit again. 1. My main concern is the novelty of this paper. Many results given in the paper are known and the proposed scheme (Eq. (7)) is quite intuitive and expected. In the cell edge, the SINR at the UE is low and the angles of arrival of both antennas are in line. As a result, dual beamforming is not feasible anyways. Therefore, the carrier does not expect UE to employ dual beamforming at cell edge in practice. Since the contribution of this paper is small, I think this paper can be condensed to a letter paper instead. 2. I don’t think it is appropriate to claim “2 bps/Hz SE gain” in the abstract. This specific gain is only observed based on simulation on specific setup, and I doubt 2 bps/Hz gain is possible across all possible setups, e.g. antenna height, distance to BS, train speed etc. 3. The first “<=” in Eq. (5) should be just “=”, right? 4. The presentation of this paper needs to be improved. For example, there are many acronyms in this paper and many of them defined only once but not used afterwards. Reviewer: 3 The authors present their study on uniform linear array (ULA) beamforming for large scale MIMO communication systems of high speed railway. However due to the lack of the basic knowledge of beamforming array for wireless communication, the discussions are not very useful to the HSR applications. In wireless communication, the base station antenna (or array) will either cover 360 degrees with one system (using omnidirectional antenna) or will split into three sectors, each cover 120 degrees (using directional antennas or arrays). Linear arrays are well known to have good beam up to 110 degrees to 120 degrees (+/- 55deg to +/-60 deg.). They may be used as a BS sector array to cover 110-120 degrees, but they are not suitable to be used alone to cover 360 degrees for a cell as discussed in this manuscript. 再见。 |
23楼2014-05-16 14:45:55
15楼2014-05-16 10:38:38
armstronglet
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 175 (高中生)
- 金币: 10498.7
- 散金: 1998
- 红花: 44
- 帖子: 3043
- 在线: 1508小时
- 虫号: 1861616
- 注册: 2012-06-16
- 专业: 人格心理学
4楼2014-05-15 18:37:36
6楼2014-05-15 23:21:59
11楼2014-05-16 08:25:51
18楼2014-05-16 12:36:09
sesame_oil
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4518 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 2.947
- 金币: 35328.4
- 散金: 385
- 红花: 188
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 18585
- 在线: 536.5小时
- 虫号: 1188734
- 注册: 2011-01-12
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
- 管辖: 论文投稿

2楼2014-05-15 17:54:14
3楼2014-05-15 18:28:19
5楼2014-05-15 18:47:12
7楼2014-05-15 23:26:00
8楼2014-05-15 23:36:15
jackdaniel
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
做最善良的那一只
- 应助: 34 (小学生)
- 金币: 3796.7
- 散金: 2621
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 1413
- 在线: 499.7小时
- 虫号: 2241332
- 注册: 2013-01-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机应用技术

9楼2014-05-16 00:04:35
洛洛的肥老头
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 13 (小学生)
- 金币: 3470.2
- 散金: 100
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 284
- 在线: 133.6小时
- 虫号: 3134306
- 注册: 2014-04-14
- 专业: 计算机网络
10楼2014-05-16 04:05:56













回复此楼

嗯,谢谢好心人安慰!虽然大家心里基本上都知道,这种情况肯定是没戏了。。。我真的只求Major revision啊。伤心死了!尤其现在这种悬而未决的状态,太闹心了。
再见陆嘉莹