24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 14667  |  回复: 30

再见陆嘉莹

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 投IEEE TVT,六周状态就变成了“Awaiting Editor Review”,是不是凶多吉少? 已有7人参与

各位投过/中过IEEE TVT的大虾们请进来帮忙看一下,我这种情况是不是杯具了?

4月1号投的IEEE TVT,类型是regular paper;
投完之后显示的是等待分配责编,“Awaiting AE assignment”;
4月9号左右变成了审理中,“Under Review”;
没两天,4月11号左右变成了责编处理,“With Associate Editor”;
这个状态一直不变,直到今天,5月15日,变成了等待主编定夺,“Awaiting Editor Review”。

也就是差不多五周的时间内,三个审稿人的意见就返回了?也就是说,我的投稿在六周时间内就出一审结果了?
咨询了一下我的导师,他觉得这篇文章凶多吉少。
我好伤心啊,这篇文章花了很多时间,写得多认真的,个人认为远比本人之前投中的两篇SCI期刊论文水平高啊。满心希望可以中TVT,谁知现在迎来了杯具的前奏。

请问各位有经验的筒子,照目前的情况,我还有哪怕一丁点儿投中的可能么?有没有人也遇到过,审稿周期不到两个月就返回意见,并且是好的结果的?

谢谢大家![泪目]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖置顶 ( 共有1个 )

再见陆嘉莹

铁虫 (初入文坛)

再见陆嘉莹: 回帖置顶 2014-05-16 14:46:08
感谢各位虫友对我的安慰和鼓励,很遗憾地告诉大家,我这篇4月1号投递的IEEE TVT的稿件,5月16号被rejected了。个人认为这篇文章的idea是比较有趣了,在写作过程中也得到了高年级牛人的指导,可惜时不我与,没能被接收。编辑决定信和三位审稿人的审稿意见我在这里贴出来,供可能需要看的朋友们参考:

Dear Dr. XX:

The review of paper

VT-2014-XXXX: XXXXXXXX

has been completed.  Attached below please find the reviewers' comments.

After careful consideration of the reviewers' comments, the decision has been made not to publish this paper in the IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. Please note that we do not accept submissions of a revised manuscript based on this rejected paper.  We are aware that there is the inherent possibility of wrong decisions in any review process. However, we hope you will understand that, in fairness to all authors and reviewers,  reject decisions are considered to be final decisions.

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the TRANSACTIONS. We look forward to the possibility of  receiving more submissions on your future technical work.

Sincerely yours,

Prof. XXX
Editor, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Reviewer: 1
The paper describes an ad-hoc beamforming adaptation method for massive MIMO.

While the method is technically effective, this reviewer considers that the analysis is minimal and that the paper will not be of sufficient value for the TVT readership.

Effective adaptive technique, perhaps of interest to the industry

The paper is written fairly well (although there is a huge space on page 7)

Reviewer: 2
This paper is on beamforming for large-scale MIMO communication systems for high speed railway. There are some issues the authors need to address before possible publication in TVT. The authors are encourage to revise the paper and submit again.

1. My main concern is the novelty of this paper. Many results given in the paper are known and the proposed scheme (Eq. (7)) is quite intuitive and expected. In the cell edge, the SINR at the UE is low and the angles of arrival of both antennas are in line. As a result, dual beamforming is not feasible anyways. Therefore, the carrier does not expect UE to employ dual beamforming at cell edge in practice. Since the contribution of this paper is small, I think this paper can be condensed to a letter paper instead.

2. I don’t think it is appropriate to claim “2 bps/Hz SE gain” in the abstract. This specific gain is only observed based on simulation on specific setup, and I doubt 2 bps/Hz gain is possible across all possible setups, e.g. antenna height, distance to BS, train speed etc.

3. The first “<=” in Eq. (5) should be just “=”, right?

4. The presentation of this paper needs to be improved. For example, there are many acronyms in this paper and many of them defined only once but not used afterwards.

Reviewer: 3
The authors present their study on uniform linear array (ULA) beamforming for large scale MIMO communication systems of high speed railway. However due to the lack of the basic knowledge of beamforming array for wireless communication, the discussions are not very useful to the HSR applications.
In wireless communication, the base station antenna (or array) will either cover 360 degrees with one system (using omnidirectional antenna) or will split into three sectors, each cover 120 degrees (using directional antennas or arrays). Linear arrays are well known to have good beam up to 110 degrees  to 120 degrees (+/- 55deg to +/-60 deg.). They may be used as a BS sector array to cover 110-120 degrees, but they are not suitable to be used alone to cover 360 degrees for a cell as discussed in this manuscript.

再见。
23楼2014-05-16 14:45:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

ustcsp

新虫 (初入文坛)

我也是投了TVT,不到两个月出结果,大修中。放心吧,最近编辑效率挺高的
15楼2014-05-16 10:38:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

armstronglet

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
再见陆嘉莹: 金币+1, 散金币 2014-05-16 14:38:05
时间上不能说明什么,什么都有可能,耐心等吧
4楼2014-05-15 18:37:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
再见陆嘉莹: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助, 回帖者用自己的实际经验回答了楼主的提问。 2014-05-15 23:28:00
本帖仅楼主可见
6楼2014-05-15 23:21:59
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

再见陆嘉莹

铁虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by jackdaniel at 2014-05-16 00:04:35
建议楼主还是等最终邮件吧。状态应该说明不了什么吧。最后即使是悲剧起码审稿时间没有太久,可以抓紧时间修改再投的。祝好运~

谢谢威士忌前辈忠告!你说得对,这个悲剧来得还挺迅速,倒是为修改再投留出了足够的时间。
11楼2014-05-16 08:25:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

再见陆嘉莹

铁虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
17楼: Originally posted by yaosaijie at 2014-05-16 10:59:13
我也是这个状态持续了一个多礼拜,挂了。祝楼主好运。

唉,吃个午饭回来,结果出来了,我毫不意外地挂了。。。难兄难弟啊。。。
18楼2014-05-16 12:36:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

sesame_oil

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
别着急,等邮件就行了,不要揣测
不是哥不笑,一笑粉就掉
2楼2014-05-15 17:54:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

再见陆嘉莹

铁虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by sesame_oil at 2014-05-15 17:54:14
别着急,等邮件就行了,不要揣测

唉,修为不够,不能不着急啊。。。。
3楼2014-05-15 18:28:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

再见陆嘉莹

铁虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by armstronglet at 2014-05-15 18:37:36
时间上不能说明什么,什么都有可能,耐心等吧

嗯,谢谢好心人安慰!虽然大家心里基本上都知道,这种情况肯定是没戏了。。。我真的只求Major revision啊。伤心死了!尤其现在这种悬而未决的状态,太闹心了。
5楼2014-05-15 18:47:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

再见陆嘉莹

铁虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by wang31aa at 2014-05-15 23:21:59
现在结果呢?我也是五周左右,拒了。。。

唉,估计是要同病相怜了啊。结果还没出,状态木有变化,但是从常理上来讲,杯具的结局应该是跑不了了。
请问你大概记得你的“Awaiting Editor Review”的状态持续了多久么?
7楼2014-05-15 23:26:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

crr102316

铜虫 (初入文坛)

嘻嘻

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
8楼2014-05-15 23:36:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jackdaniel

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)

做最善良的那一只

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
再见陆嘉莹: 金币+1, 有帮助, 回帖者为楼主指出了问题的另一面。 2014-05-16 08:26:28
建议楼主还是等最终邮件吧。状态应该说明不了什么吧。最后即使是悲剧起码审稿时间没有太久,可以抓紧时间修改再投的。祝好运~

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
对自己负责
9楼2014-05-16 00:04:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

洛洛的肥老头

木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
不好说啊,不过确实略微快了一点,我以前投tvt,一审两个半月给了个拒稿重投,之后每次修改都等了五个礼拜左右,好在最后接收了。你这个情况也是有可能是个好结果的。

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

10楼2014-05-16 04:05:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 再见陆嘉莹 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见