|
|
再见陆嘉莹: 回帖置顶 2014-05-16 14:46:08
感谢各位虫友对我的安慰和鼓励，很遗憾地告诉大家，我这篇4月1号投递的IEEE TVT的稿件，5月16号被rejected了。个人认为这篇文章的idea是比较有趣了，在写作过程中也得到了高年级牛人的指导，可惜时不我与，没能被接收。编辑决定信和三位审稿人的审稿意见我在这里贴出来，供可能需要看的朋友们参考：
Dear Dr. XX:
The review of paper
VT-2014-XXXX: XXXXXXXX
has been completed. Attached below please find the reviewers' comments.
After careful consideration of the reviewers' comments, the decision has been made not to publish this paper in the IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. Please note that we do not accept submissions of a revised manuscript based on this rejected paper. We are aware that there is the inherent possibility of wrong decisions in any review process. However, we hope you will understand that, in fairness to all authors and reviewers, reject decisions are considered to be final decisions.
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the TRANSACTIONS. We look forward to the possibility of receiving more submissions on your future technical work.
Sincerely yours,
Prof. XXX
Editor, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
Reviewer: 1
The paper describes an ad-hoc beamforming adaptation method for massive MIMO.
While the method is technically effective, this reviewer considers that the analysis is minimal and that the paper will not be of sufficient value for the TVT readership.
Effective adaptive technique, perhaps of interest to the industry
The paper is written fairly well (although there is a huge space on page 7)
Reviewer: 2
This paper is on beamforming for large-scale MIMO communication systems for high speed railway. There are some issues the authors need to address before possible publication in TVT. The authors are encourage to revise the paper and submit again.
1. My main concern is the novelty of this paper. Many results given in the paper are known and the proposed scheme (Eq. (7)) is quite intuitive and expected. In the cell edge, the SINR at the UE is low and the angles of arrival of both antennas are in line. As a result, dual beamforming is not feasible anyways. Therefore, the carrier does not expect UE to employ dual beamforming at cell edge in practice. Since the contribution of this paper is small, I think this paper can be condensed to a letter paper instead.
2. I don’t think it is appropriate to claim “2 bps/Hz SE gain” in the abstract. This specific gain is only observed based on simulation on specific setup, and I doubt 2 bps/Hz gain is possible across all possible setups, e.g. antenna height, distance to BS, train speed etc.
3. The first “<=” in Eq. (5) should be just “=”, right?
4. The presentation of this paper needs to be improved. For example, there are many acronyms in this paper and many of them defined only once but not used afterwards.
Reviewer: 3
The authors present their study on uniform linear array (ULA) beamforming for large scale MIMO communication systems of high speed railway. However due to the lack of the basic knowledge of beamforming array for wireless communication, the discussions are not very useful to the HSR applications.
In wireless communication, the base station antenna (or array) will either cover 360 degrees with one system (using omnidirectional antenna) or will split into three sectors, each cover 120 degrees (using directional antennas or arrays). Linear arrays are well known to have good beam up to 110 degrees to 120 degrees (+/- 55deg to +/-60 deg.). They may be used as a BS sector array to cover 110-120 degrees, but they are not suitable to be used alone to cover 360 degrees for a cell as discussed in this manuscript.
再见。 |
|
回复此楼