24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 7266  |  回复: 25
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

285561706

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] IET论文被拒了,该如何是好

本来知道自己论文创新点不大够,审稿两个月还是被拒了,心理还是有一定准备吧,主编建议重投,到底还是重投还是投其它的水刊呢,顺带求电力电子和材料加工(焊接)的方向易中的SCI(影响因子小于1都行)
Thank you for submitting your paper to IET ---. The peer review process is now complete. We feel that your paper requires significantly more work and is not acceptable for publication in its current form.  Our decision is therefore to decline your paper with encouragement to submit a substantially revised paper.  We appreciate that this decision will be a disappointment, but hope that you find the referees' comments (given below) useful in improving your paper.

If, following comprehensive revision, you should choose to submit your paper again, please go to …….

When submitting a revised manuscript, please ensure that all points raised by the referees have been actioned, and include a detailed covering letter explaining the changes made.  Note that the revised paper will be treated as a completely new submission and sent out for a fresh round of reviewing.

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
This work is mainly about the digital implementation of the control of an inverter. In my opinion it does not provide any valuable information about the digital implementation itself, e.g. the discrete-time model of the plant or the stability analysis of the closed-loop system. The authors only provide general information and do not go into the details of any aspect.

In order to better appreciate the contribution of your work I would recommend to focus the attention of your paper into a particular aspect of the implementation and go into the very details of it providing valuable information to the reader.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
This paper does not include an advance in power electronics, but show a good engineering example.
For publication, this paper should be revised.

First, it is better to find some alternative terms of former and latter inverters.
In the paper, the former inverter and the high frequency transformer part is a typical phase-shifted full bridge converter. You may use some other words, for example, pre- or post processing stages.

Second, the design procedure should be more detailed.

Third, the use of the certain microprocessor may be omitted.

Fourth, although the authors have claimed 'digital control', I don't see any significant advance or important content for 'digital control'.
Please add more analysis based on digital control theory in power electronics.
Otherwise, it is better not to emphasize 'digital'.

Fifth, the English language should be improved.

Reviewer: 3

Comments to the Author
1.The authors claim improvements in quality of output current and higher efficiency – could you please validate them with respect to the conventional approach, at least by using simulations?
2. Could you please provide results for transient conditions in simulations and experimentally?
3. Could you please state it very clearly what is novelty of the paper?
4. Reference [6] is not available
回复此楼
、简单就好、
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

伤哒心

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
285561706: 金币+2, 谢谢回答 2014-05-13 08:37:28
我看了审稿意见,觉得你还是修改了果断另投吧,意见不太正面,而且离审稿人要求差的比较远。这三个审稿人都比较客气。
走别人的路,让别人无路可走
13楼2014-05-13 08:28:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 26 个回答

armstronglet

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
285561706: 金币+5 2014-05-10 21:36:51
关键是创新点的问题,要突出创新点,并让审稿人认可。再就是其理论基础和具体实现的问题没有论述清楚。如果理论基础能够写清楚,就修改重投。如果自己感觉驾驭不了“数字控制”的理论本质,还是改投工程应用类杂志吧(类似IEEE的Magazine,对创新要求不高,对理论要求也不高,但工程应用要求论述全面)
2楼2014-05-10 21:19:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

285561706

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by armstronglet at 2014-05-10 21:19:14
关键是创新点的问题,要突出创新点,并让审稿人认可。再就是其理论基础和具体实现的问题没有论述清楚。如果理论基础能够写清楚,就修改重投。如果自己感觉驾驭不了“数字控制”的理论本质,还是改投工程应用类杂志吧 ...

恩 其实实验室都不搞这些理论基础的   连导师自己都清楚这一弱项   虽然Reject & Resubmit ,网上说是“大修中的大修”,说明还是有一定希望   但说实话心理没底  得咨询导师的打算了……个人觉得符合自己的研究实际,投工程应用类的……话说IEEE的magazine会不会也挺难的  ,还有类似的工程应用类有哪些相对好中的……感谢你的回答啊
、简单就好、
3楼2014-05-10 21:36:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

armstronglet

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
IEEE的magazine没投过,不知道好不好中。可以试一下,即便被拒也是很快。电力电子的有个今年刚创刊的:IEEE Power Electronics Magazine,看会不会容易一些。即便是Magazine,你的方案的实现过程还是要详细论述。
4楼2014-05-10 21:54:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +5 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 9/450 2026-08-30 22:23 by 余韵清
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +4 echo8914667 2026-08-30 5/250 2026-08-30 21:11 by echo8914667
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +11 eulota 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 14:22 by 火星超人xi
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 5/250 2026-08-27 20:50 by gdfollow
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项 +23 koalala 2026-08-24 26/1300 2026-08-26 14:29 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 国际合作可查了,中了面上 (EPI+1)(金币+50) +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
信息提示
请填处理意见