²é¿´: 2424  |  »Ø¸´: 6
µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû

kuner

Ìú³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

[ÇóÖú] µÂ°ÝÄ£Ð͵IJî±ðÒÑÓÐ3È˲ÎÓë

ͶÁËһƪ¹ØÓÚZrºÏ½ðÈÈÁ¦Ñ§ºÍµ¯ÐÔÐÔÖʼÆËã·½ÃæµÄÎÄÕ£¬ÓõÄÊǵ°ÝÄ£ÐͼÆËãµÄÈÈÁ¦Ñ§ÐÔÖÊ£¬ÊÕµ½Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÖ®Ò»ÊÇ£º
What is the difference between the used "qasiharmonic Debye model" and classical Debye-Gr¨¹neisen model (V.L. Moruzzi, J.F. Janak, K. Schwarz, Calculated thermal properties of metals, Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 790-799)? Wouldn't it be more correct to call the model Debye-Gr¨¹neisen model (in a conventional way)?
ÀÏʵ˵£¬ÎÒ¶¼²»ÖªµÀÈçºÎ»Ø´ð£¬ÇëÖªµÀµÄ¸ßÊÖÖ¸½Ì°¡£¡
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

future_wl

ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû

¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
liliangfang: ½ð±Ò+1, лл½»Á÷ 2014-05-20 07:52:54
qasiharmonic Debye modelÊÇ׼г½üËÆ?Ô°ÝÄ£ÐÍ£¬Ëü½éÓÚ¼òгºÍ·Çг֮¼ä£¬ÈÏΪÌåϵµÄÄÜÁ¿ºÍÉù×ӵįµÂÊÖ»ÒÀÀµÓÚÌå»ýµÄ±ä»¯¡£
δÀ´¾ÍÊÇÏÖÔÚ
3Â¥2014-05-01 07:31:07
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ kuner µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û