| ²é¿´: 1167 | »Ø¸´: 0 | ||
angellemin½ð³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
XPS²â¶¨Ê¯Ä«Ï©ÎÊÌâ
|
| Óù⻹ÔÑõ»¯Ê¯Ä«Ï©£¬Éó¸åÈËÌá³öÕâÑùÒ»¸öÎÊÌâ¡°How was the charging effect exactly removed from the XPS spectra ¡°the charging shift was corrected by the binding energy of C1s at 284.6 eV¡± is a bit confusing for me. I guess that the authors meant that the effect of sample charging on the position of the C1s envelope was removed by shifting the main peak at the low binding energy side to 284.6 eV, which corresponds to the binding energy of 1s electrons in graphite.¡±ÎÒ²»¶®Ñ½£¬ÎÒ¾ÍÊǰ´ÕÕÆäËûÎÄÏ×ÄÇÑù²âµÄXPS£¬¹âÕÕǰ¸ø¸öC1sÆ×£¬¹âÕÕºó¸ø¸öC1sÆ×£¬È»ºó·Ö·å¶ÔÕÕ¸÷º¬Ñõ̼µÄ±ÈÀý¡£Õâ¸öcharging effectÊÇʲô¶«Î÷£¿Éó¸åÈ˸ߵÍ˵µÄÊÇʲô£¿ÄÄλ´óÏÀ°ïæ½âÊÍһϡ£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
303Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
306Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
275Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤´óѧ070300 ѧ˶336Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
318Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
305·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á£¨Ê³Æ·¹¤³Ì£©
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)
ÕÒµ½Ò»Ð©Ïà¹ØµÄ¾«»ªÌû×Ó£¬Ï£ÍûÓÐÓÃŶ~
Çë½Ì¸÷λ´óÉñÒ»¸öÊ¯Ä«Ï©ÖÆ±¸ÖеÄÎÊÌ⣬À§»óÎÒͦ¾ÃÁË
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú£¬ Âé·³×ÉѯһÏ£¬²ôµªÊ¯Ä«Ï©ÖÐNÔªËØÀûÓÃXPS±íÕ÷£¿ÓÐЧÆÚÖÁ2014Äê3ÔÂ10ÈÕ£¬
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ʯīϩ¸ºÔز¬ÑùÆ·Öв¬µÄº¬Á¿²â¶¨Óöµ½À§ÄÑ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚʯīϩ±íÃæ»ùÍŻ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ʯīϩ¸ºÔؽðÊôÑõ»¯ÎïÄÉÃ×Á£×Ó³öÏÖÒì³£µÄ´ó³ß´çÁ£×Ó
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú£ºÆæ¹ÖµÄÑõ»¯Ê¯Ä«Ï©£¨GO£©ÀÂüÆ×Ïß
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ñõ»¯Ê¯Ä«Ï©ºÍʯīϩµÄXPS½á¹û
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Çó½Ì£¬Äܵ¥´¿ÓÃXPS±íÕ÷½á¹û˵Ã÷»¹ÔʯīϩÖÐCÊÇsp2ÔÓ»¯Âð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ñõ»¯Ê¯Ä«Ï©µÄXRD²âÊÔ
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ±íÕ÷Ñõ»¯Ê¯Ä«Ï©£¨GO£©µÄ»¹Ô³Ì¶È
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
ÔõÑù²âÁ¿Ñõ»¯Ê¯Ä«ÒÔ¼°RGOµÄ̼Ñõ±ÈC/O
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
[b][ÇóÖú] AFM ²âÁ¿Ê¯Ä«Ï©ºñ¶ÈÖеÄÖÆÑùÎÊÌâ[/b]
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
Ê¯Ä«Ï©ÔØ²¬»ò²¬»ùºÏ½ðCV²âÊÔÖÐÍÑÇâ·åûÓлòÕß²»Ã÷ÏÔ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
ÇëÎÊÏÂÃæµÄXRDºÍXPSÄÜ˵Ã÷ÊÇʯīϩÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
¡¾ÌÖÂÛ¡¿ÇëÎÊʯīϩÑõ»¯Îï(GO)ºÍʯīϩŨ¶È²â¶¨µÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
¡¾Çë½Ì¡¿Ê¯Ä«Ï©²ÄÁÏXPSÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Ê¯Ä«Ï©µÄ±íÕ÷ÖÆÑùÇë½Ì XPS XRD ÀÂü
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Ê¯Ä«Ï©ÀÂü²âÊÔÑùÆ·ÔõÃ´ÖÆ±¸
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
¿ÆÑдÓСľ³æ¿ªÊ¼£¬ÈËÈËΪÎÒ£¬ÎÒΪÈËÈË













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

µã»÷ÕâÀïËÑË÷¸ü¶àÏà¹Ø×ÊÔ´