24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

vortexstar

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 15 (小学生)
金币: 1315.1
帖子: 567
在线: 177.4小时
虫号: 2529726

[交流] 改投or重投

Dear Mr. ***
Decision: Reject, re-submittal possible
Reports from two referees on your paper have now been received, and are shown below. You will see that Rev 1 is more supportive but Rev 2 rejects the paper on the ground that the study is not sufficiently novel.
They both point out the severe lack of comprehensive coverage of literature as well as adequacy of the various descriptions of the subject matter. Rev 2 further questions the validity of the *** and you are encouraged to present a better validation than simple comparison with the empirical formula of Eq. (3). I think you can best do that after you have gone through all the suggested additional reference papers so that the novelty is enhanced and highlighted more specifically. If you could do that and come back with a significantly revised manuscript, we would be happy to re-consider the manuscript.
If you decide to submit a revised 'new submission', please include a summary for the editor of what is different about the new version,together with any appropriate responses or changes made. A note of the reference number of this manuscript would also be helpful.
Thank you for giving us this opportunity to consider your work.
Yours sincerely,

****
Subject Editor
Journal of Sound and Vibration

投稿journal of sound and vibration，历时四个多月的under review，等来这个结果，虫子们建议修改后重投还是改投他刊？

[ Last edited by vortexstar on 2014-4-26 at 22:57 ]

回复此楼