应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » corrosion science状态求助
南方科技大学公共卫生及应急管理学院2025级博士研究生招生报考通知
51/1返回列表
查看: 1766  |  回复: 10
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

秦苏辽

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] corrosion science状态求助已有3人参与

大神们给看看，投稿一个多月了，还是这状态，正常么？

corrosion science状态求助
aa.jpg
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
不生产砖头，只做泥巴的搬运工
1楼2014-04-24 11:21:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wwmwwm

银虫 (正式写手)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
Reviewers' comments:
(1) The research highlights are unintelligible. Possibly because of the undefined symbols, or possibly because of poor highlights.  However, they are not acceptable.

(2) No mesure of reproducibility. The order of the polarisation curves in each figure appears totally random. Any trends here, must come from a statistically derived scatter band through reproducibility experiments.

(3) Do not use the word "anti-corrosion". There are correct and accepted words for this.

(4) The introduction should not describe "low cost". That is irrelevant and there are no costs or reference to this provided.

(5) The word "behavior" should be used in singular form only.  The same is true for "literature", "discussion" and "research".

(6) Polarization curves show no pitting potentials.  It is hard to see where these numbers come from.

(7) No trends are shown in Fig 3.  In addition, the parameters are all independent of the chloride concentration, which for `Epit at least, is nonsense.

(8) The use of 5 mV/s is too fast to determine any form of corrosion parameter to be determined. It will not give a icorr, Ecorr or Epit.

(9) It is hard to see how these electrodes were made. The only description is Fig 1, which is a poor photo. Does the electrode have only one side with exposed metal, or are both sides exposed. The image in Fig 1 appears to show the left end fully coated and the right end fully exposed. Without a full description, the electrochemistry is not clear at all.

(10) The XPS spectra in Fig 5 are after "electrochemically corroded in 1 M NaCl solution". However, the caption does not state at what potential, or whether this was after some potential scan. Perhaps it was after one of the polarization curves? Whatever it is, it is undefined.  

(11) Further, if it is after polarisation curve measurement, then the XPS does not show any sort of passive film, since the metal has been corroding actively.  Mostly what is seen here is corrosion product.  The problem with this paper is that it does not tell the reader exactly what was done and how it was done.

(12) The current density scale in Fig 2 is a complete mystery.  The units of the y axes are "10 mA/mm^2". What does this mean????

(13) There are many further major problems with this paper, both in the poor description of what was done, in the analysis of the results and in the interpretation. The subject is interesting, but the paper is not rigorous.

(14) The paper should not be published in this present state. Reject.
赞一下 回复此楼
i_come_from_the_village
8楼2014-04-27 20:06:49
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

lehigh_73

金虫 (著名写手)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
什么状态，看不见图。

我去年12月24投的，今天刚拿到审稿意见，大修。。。。。。。。。
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2014-04-24 21:23:10
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

秦苏辽

木虫 (正式写手)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by lehigh_73 at 2014-04-24 21:23:10
什么状态，看不见图。

我去年12月24投的，今天刚拿到审稿意见，大修。。。。。。。。。

只有initial date submitted，和current status:with editor,已经一个多月了。
赞一下 回复此楼
不生产砖头，只做泥巴的搬运工
3楼2014-04-24 22:05:16
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

苍穹

银虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
没事，with editor 70天的默默飘过~~
赞一下 回复此楼
多看，多想，多问~~~
4楼2014-04-26 11:35:07
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭