| ²é¿´: 449 | »Ø¸´: 0 | ||
clcelvis½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
Сľ³æ
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÈçºÎÅжÏÒ»ÖÖËõ°±Ëá·Ö×ÓÓëϸ°ûµÄ½áºÏЧÂÊ£¿ÅжϵĻúÀíÊÇʲô£¿
|
|
¿´µ½Ò»ÆªÎÄÏ×£¬ÎÞÄÎ֪ʶÖü±¸ÓÐÏÞ£¬»¹Çë´óÉñÖ¸½Ì¡£ÄÇÆªÎÄÏ×ÊÇMagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoworms for Tumor Targeting and Imaging** ByJi-Ho Park, Geoffrey von Maltzahn, Lianglin Zhang, Michael P. Schwartz, Erkki Ruoslahti, Sangeeta N. Bhatia,andMichael J. Sailor* Figure 2. Internalization of nanoworms (NWs) and nanospheres (NSs) conjugated with F3 peptides into MDA-MB-435 cells. Conceptual scheme illustrating the increased multivalent interactions expected between receptors on a cell surface and targeting ligands on a NW compared with a NS. b) Fluorescence data comparing the efficiency of cellular internalization for various functionalized NW and NS systems. NH2, F3, and PEG-F3 indicate aminated NW/NS, F3-conjugated NW/NS and PEGylgated F3-conjugated NW/NS, respectively. c) Fluorescence microscope images of cells 3 h after incubation with F3(FITC)-conjugated NW (NW-175-F) or F3(FITC)-conjugated NS (NS-30-F) (green). Nuclei are visualized with a DAPI stain (blue). Scale bar is 20mm ÎÒ²»Àí½âÓ«¹â²âÊԵIJâÊÔ»úÀí£¿ÎªÊ²Ã´Ëõ°±Ëá·Ö×ÓÓëϸ°û½áºÏ¾ÍÄÜÏÔʾӫ¹â£¿²»½áºÏ¾Í²»ÄÜÏÔʾӫ¹â£¿ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
·´Ó¦²úÎï×ÜÌá²»ÉÏÁ¿£¿ÁÄÁÄÎÞ»ú½¹Á×ËáøÔÚºËËáºÏ³ÉÀïµÄʵÓüÛÖµ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
¡¾¾Ñé·ÖÏí¡¿ÌåÍâת¼²È¿ÓÎÞÊý£¬ÍÚµ½Ò»¿îºÃÓõĹú²ú T7 RNA ¾ÛºÏø
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïÎïÀí¡¢ÉúÎﻯѧÓë·Ö×ÓÉúÎïѧÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ104È˻ظ´
ÌåÍâת¼ / PCR ×ÜÌá²»ÉϲúÁ¿£¿ÖÕÓÚÕÒµ½Îȶ¨ºÃÓõÄÎÞ»ú½¹Á×Ëáø
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
[»áÒéÔ¤¸æ]2026ÉúÎïÒ½Ò©²úÒµ·¢Õ¹´ó»á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
¡¾²úÆ·²âÆÀ·ÖÏí¡¿ÌåÍâת¼²úÁ¿²»ÀíÏë¡¢dsRNA ¸±²úÎï¸ß£¿T7 RNA ¾ÛºÏøʵ²âÌåÑé
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¡¾½»Á÷¡¿µ°°×±êÇ©Çгý²È¿Ó²»¶Ï£¿ÁÄÁÄ TEV µ°°×øʵ²ÙÌå»á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
¡¾½»Á÷¡¿SUMO Èںϵ°°×ÇбêÇ©²È¿Ó£¿ÁÄÁÄ SUMO µ°°×øʵ²ÙÌå»á
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÕâЩ¹ú¼ÊÆÚ¿¯ÕýÔÚÕÐļÇàÄê±àί
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)

ÕÒµ½Ò»Ð©Ïà¹ØµÄ¾«»ªÌû×Ó£¬Ï£ÍûÓÐÓÃŶ~
2014Äê¶ÈÕã½Ê¡×ÔÈ»¿ÆÑ§»ù½ðÄâ×ÊÖúÏîÄ¿Çåµ¥
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïÐÅϢѧרÌâ£ÉúÎï°æ£¬Ò½Ñ§°æºÍÐÅÏ¢¿ÆÑ§°æ¹²Í¬´´½¨
ÒѾÓÐ87È˻ظ´
¿ÆÑдÓСľ³æ¿ªÊ¼£¬ÈËÈËΪÎÒ£¬ÎÒΪÈËÈË









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

µã»÷ÕâÀïËÑË÷¸ü¶àÏà¹Ø×ÊÔ´
ͶƱ: