| 查看: 1322 | 回复: 1 | |||
ecg001金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
BBRC拒稿信,大家给看看这有希望么,具体修改要求是什么?已有1人参与
|
|
After a careful review of your manuscript, I am afraid that we are not able to accept it for publication in BBRC in its current form. As you know, this is a rapid communication journal and not all submissions, regardless of their merit, are suitable for this format. Our standards are increasingly high, and in fact, approximately 80% of submissions do not meet our criteria. Reviewer comments: In the paper by Zhao et al., titled "****", the authors present results showing that ****. Given that the treatment of*** urges for new strategies, I would recommend this paper for publication if it were not for the fact that the manuscript requires significant revision and thus it does not qualify for fast publication in BBRC. Major points: 1. In Methods, the description of the measurements of MDA, an index of lipid peroxidation, and GSH is poor (only cited the original references). These methodologies should be described at least in a brief way. 2. In Figures 1 and 2A, the symbols are too small and the statistical significance of the differences between groups is not shown. The differences should be analyzed at each time point, and between the different conditions used. I am sorry to convey this negative decision; I know it is a disappointment. However, I thank you for the opportunity to see your work and I hope you will consider revising the work and submitting it again. With kind regards, Editor |
» 猜你喜欢
三甲基碘化亚砜的氧化反应
已经有4人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
请问有评职称,把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有5人回复
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷
已经有12人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有3人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
AI论文写作工具:是科研加速器还是学术作弊器?
已经有3人回复
论文投稿,期刊推荐
已经有4人回复
硕士和导师闹得不愉快
已经有13人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
一篇拒稿信,请各位虫友帮分析下
已经有12人回复
求助,投出去的稿件可以在第一次修改的时候改作者吗?急急急急急!!!!
已经有7人回复
SCI投稿过程总结
已经有124人回复
BBRC submitted to journal10天了!咋回事?
已经有10人回复
拒稿信求解读,是客套还是说重投的话有希望,谢谢
已经有13人回复
投JACS (communication) 遇到这种情况可以再重投吗?
已经有56人回复
拒稿信,求各位
已经有15人回复
JPBA 投稿被拒,贴出拒稿信,求指点
已经有14人回复
请问这份拒稿信说的是什么意思
已经有33人回复
投稿BBRC,被拒要求修改语言,改后重投,请问有必要这样做吗?
已经有65人回复
BBRC Editor Declined Invitation 还有机会吗
已经有8人回复
投稿BBRC被拒~~欲哭无泪
已经有24人回复
大家帮忙看下这封拒稿信是什么意思,还能继续投这个期刊吗?先谢谢各位了。
已经有3人回复
看完拒稿信后的心情
已经有37人回复
BBRC投稿,文件已上传,但为何状态显示0?
已经有10人回复
收到的最快的拒稿信!
已经有38人回复
文章被拒,请大家帮我看看拒稿信,我应该怎么办?
已经有31人回复
帮忙看看APL的拒信,重投还有希望吗?
已经有16人回复
ellen_rock
金虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 58 (初中生)
- 金币: 8656
- 散金: 10943
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 12536
- 在线: 485.5小时
- 虫号: 2122222
- 注册: 2012-11-12
- 专业: 敏感电子学与传感器
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
ecg001: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-04-09 14:25:03
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
ecg001: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-04-09 14:25:03
|
文章需要大修: 1.“In Methods, the description of the measurements of MDA, an index of lipid peroxidation, and GSH is poor (only cited the original references). These methodologies should be described at least in a brief way.” 仅引用了原始文献,而缺少对文献中方法的简要描述 2.“ In Figures 1 and 2A, the symbols are too small and the statistical significance of the differences between groups is not shown. The differences should be analyzed at each time point, and between the different conditions used.” 图1和2A中,图标太小,未表明图中组数据的统计区别,同时应当对各个时间点的区别及其条件进行分析. 总之,关键还是写作技巧和结果数据的处理问题,论文好好修改很有希望. [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ] |
2楼2014-04-09 12:50:14














回复此楼