| 查看: 562 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
zhangwayne银虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
大家帮忙看看这句话怎么写是对的
|
|
|
They were first taken to... and then used to... They were first taken to..., and then used to... They were first taken to..., and then were used to... 三种表达方式到底哪种是对的啊 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上模板改不了页边距吧？
已经有6人回复
-
307求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
317一志愿华南理工电气工程求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
272求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
化工专硕348，一志愿985求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
292求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
290求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
295求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
26申博
已经有4人回复
RXMCDM
版主 (文坛精英)
- 翻译EPI: 530
- 应助: 401 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 1.908
- 金币: 38947.6
- 散金: 4908
- 红花: 88
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 11453
- 在线: 1355.6小时
- 虫号: 2739168
- 注册: 2013-10-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 一般管理理论与研究方法论
- 管辖: 论文翻译
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
zhangwayne: 金币+5, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-03-26 09:12:06
zhangwayne: 金币+5, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-03-26 09:12:06
|
三种表达方式都是对的，第一种和第二中相当于A,B,andC;A,B and C.一般老一点的书或文章喜欢最后一种，但现在的喜欢第一种。但都是对的。你所说的第一第二种就属这种情况。三也是对的，相当于They were first taken to..., and then they were used to...,但是可以省略，既可只省略they ,也可省略they were,没有规定一定要省略那些，甚至可以不省略。关键就是要写成文章后读起来顺口。也就是提供一种可已以回旋的余地。 供你参考！ |
2楼2014-03-25 22:28:29
mac194
铁虫 (职业作家)
- 翻译EPI: 61
- 应助: 128 (高中生)
- 金币: 21401.3
- 红花: 101
- 帖子: 3332
- 在线: 3370.2小时
- 虫号: 2488597
- 注册: 2013-05-30
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★
RXMCDM: 金币+2, 多谢应助！ 2014-03-26 09:06:15
RXMCDM: 金币+2, 多谢应助！ 2014-03-26 09:06:15
|
语法三句都对,但因为都以代名词 "They" 开头,又都重复用 "to", 论结构三句都差强人意 依赖代名词是坏习惯,日常对话无可避免,写作时再不警觉,就终生难改 不知最终目标是否在于避免重复用 "were",如果是,可视情况以 "being" 适当替代某些 "were" After being moved into position, _[they]_ were used to .... <1> _[They]_ were moved into position before being used to ... <2> 主题复杂时可专用一句辨识主题,然后马上用代名词开句省很多字,所以说以上 <2> 胜过 <1> "After being moved into position" = "Following relocation" (字少,方便介绍主题) "_______ were moved to close proximity of where they will most likely be used in/on/as " (省去 "and"  ""_______ were moved to areas nearby where their deployment as.... is most likely" ("deployment" = [名词]"use" "_______ were kept courtside so deployment would be a snap (不能确定,所以用 "would" |
3楼2014-03-26 04:43:41
