| 查看: 4202 | 回复: 4 | ||||
donger银虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
关于PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS投稿 已有3人参与
|
|
投了篇文章，不太懂编辑的意思，尤其是这句 “only if it makes a transparent and compelling case for publication in PRL, as opposed to a more specialized journal.”？下一步应该干嘛，，，回复意见如下： Dear Dr. ****, We have considered your submission to Physical Review Letters. We ask you to respond to the comments below before we proceed further. We make no judgment on the correctness or technical aspects of your work. From our understanding of the paper's physics results, context, and motivation, it is not clear to us why it would meet our criteria of impact, innovation, and interest. Our criteria require a clear justification for consideration of the paper by PRL, rather than by a specialized journal. Your work appears better suited for submittal to the latter. [Please see our recent editorial http://journals.aps.org/prl/edannounce/PhysRevLett.111.180001 (2013).] We would be willing to consider a revised version of your paper, but only if it makes a transparent and compelling case for publication in PRL, as opposed to a more specialized journal. but only if it makes a transparent and compelling case for publication in PRL, as opposed to a more specialized journal. If a version arrives that makes this case well, we may decide that anonymous review is warranted. If we find the manuscript unsuitable for review, possibly following input from a Divisional Associate Editor, we will inform you promptly. Yours sincerely, Stojan Rebic Assistant Editor Physical Review Letters Email: prl@aps.org http://journals.aps.org/prl/ APS Partners with ORCID Link your identifier via https://authors.aps.org/Profile IMPORTANT: Editorial "Review Changes" http://journals.aps.org/prl/edannounce/PhysRevLett.111.180001 PROBLEMS WITH MANUSCRIPT: The following problems were noted in your manuscript. * We prefer figures to be submitted electronically for all manuscripts. Our file preference is PostScript or Encapsulated PostScript (EPS). Each electronic figure (or well-separated figure part) should be contained in a separate file and clearly labeled. For Word and PDF submissions, all textual material AND figures should be in a single file but we do need separate electronic figure files as well for production purposes. PostScript files should print correctly on a PostScript printer that has not had any fonts or scripts downloaded to it. See http://journals.aps.org/authors/ ... nes-physical-review for further details. Yours sincerely, Stojan Rebic Assistant Editor Physical Review Letters Email: prl@aps.org http://journals.aps.org/prl/ APS Partners with ORCID Link your identifier via https://authors.aps.org/Profile IMPORTANT: Editorial "Review Changes" http://journals.aps.org/prl/edannounce/PhysRevLett.111.180001 PROBLEMS WITH MANUSCRIPT: The following problems were noted in your manuscript. * We prefer figures to be submitted electronically for all manuscripts. Our file preference is PostScript or Encapsulated PostScript (EPS). Each electronic figure (or well-separated figure part) should be contained in a separate file and clearly labeled. For Word and PDF submissions, all textual material AND figures should be in a single file but we do need separate electronic figure files as well for production purposes. PostScript files should print correctly on a PostScript printer that has not had any fonts or scripts downloaded to it. See http://journals.aps.org/authors/ ... nes-physical-review for further details. |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 论文投审 | Phys Rev Lett |
» 猜你喜欢
filecode
已经有14人回复
-
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有4人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有20人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有35人回复
-
长年满屏的广告，版主太不责任了。基金也等的急
已经有3人回复
-
不应该看fileCode
已经有4人回复
-
2019年青年基金涵评意见，大家看看几个A，几个B?
已经有5人回复
-
职称评审，求友友推荐见刊最快的期刊
已经有4人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有10人回复
-
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分？
已经有13人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 请教一下有过《green chemistry》投稿经验的虫友
已经有6人回复
- 求助期刊副主编来信问题。
已经有6人回复
- 请问Physics Review Letters是一定要收版面费吗
已经有3人回复
- Physical Review E投稿求助。。。
已经有23人回复
- 求助投AO，现在状态是Preproduction Review，代表什么？
已经有16人回复
- Optics Letters 具体的peer review status 在哪看的到？
已经有9人回复
- Optics Letter 返回审稿意见，请大家支招，如何处理？多谢！
已经有14人回复
- 文章投稿格式求助
已经有3人回复
- 关于optics letter的 Peer review status
已经有6人回复
- 如何才能发physcial review letters?
已经有8人回复
- 有关PRL的投稿状态
已经有23人回复
- 收到Pattern recognition letters的comments了，关于修改后的问题
已经有12人回复
- materials letters under review 80天了
已经有3人回复
- Physical Review Letters 投稿模板
已经有4人回复
- Physical Review E 投稿求助
已经有29人回复
- 求Physical Review E 或SIAM Review 投稿模板
已经有4人回复
- Materials Letters的under review一般多久？
已经有34人回复
- physical review letters 投稿询问
已经有17人回复
- 关于PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
已经有32人回复
sigma
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 694 (博士)
- 金币: 5538.8
- 散金: 50
- 红花: 43
- 帖子: 2154
- 在线: 208.3小时
- 虫号: 165203
- 注册: 2006-01-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学
2楼2014-03-25 01:09:24
pjstang
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 200 (高中生)
- 金币: 2177.2
- 散金: 1565
- 红花: 17
- 帖子: 1555
- 在线: 292.1小时
- 虫号: 826940
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 专业: 环境分析化学
3楼2014-03-25 07:04:03
dndxwoaini
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 19.4
- 散金: 100
- 帖子: 126
- 在线: 150.9小时
- 虫号: 1053556
- 注册: 2010-07-07
- 专业: 膜生物化学与膜生物物理学
4楼2014-03-25 08:54:36
5楼2018-05-05 15:22:36
