| 查看: 2621 | 回复: 18 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
第一性原理计算软件开发已有5人参与
|
|||
| 大规模并行第一性原理计算软件开发！走起！ |
回复此楼» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
chuanghua304» 猜你喜欢
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有3人回复
-
投稿返修后收到这样的回复，还有希望吗
已经有7人回复
-
压汞仪和BET测气凝胶孔隙率
已经有4人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有14人回复
-
谈谈两天一夜的“延安行”
已经有13人回复
-
氨基封端PDMS和HDI反应快速固化
已经有11人回复
-
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有11人回复
-
论文投稿求助
已经有4人回复
-
Applied Surface Science 这个期刊。有哪位虫友投过的能把word模板发给我参考一下嘛
已经有3人回复
-
投稿精细化工
已经有6人回复
|
From google: From my 15 years of thinking about scientific software: If your code runs 25% faster because you write it in Fortran, but it takes you 4 times as long to write it (no STL, difficulty implementing complex data structures, etc), then Fortran only wins if you spend a significant fraction of your day twiddling thumbs and waiting for your computations to finish. Given that for almost all of us the most valuable thing is our own time, the conclusion is this: use the language that allows you to develop, debug and test your code the fastest, within reason ignoring that it may be slower than maybe possible if you wrote it in Fortran. |
13楼2014-03-29 19:00:05
2楼2014-03-23 18:28:19
4楼2014-03-25 20:47:45
5楼2014-03-25 20:54:31