24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1167  |  回复: 3
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

化合态游离态

木虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 第一次写GRE的AW-- ISSUE,希望大家批评指正 已有1人参与

题目: As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

正文:
With the development of society, it is a undeniable fact that we rely more and more on technologies, that is, we now can not live without technologies such as vehicles, electricity, mobile phone and so on. Consider this from a modern perspective, we have already get used to the convenience that technologies provide. How can people image/imagine living without electricity and modern conveniences?  And how can we envision the life without transportation in this booming society?This kind of feeling just like lost something important. So the statement is partly reasonable that we are more and more rely on technologies to solve different kinds of problems in our daily life.

  However, the statement may be somewhat negative to the use of technology. Laking of confidence to the people around. To draw a conclusion, it all depends on what views you hold and what is your standpoint, therefore, it is naturally to draw tendentious/biased conclusions because of a uncomprehensive understanding/overview. There are many historical examples. Aristotle, a great philosopher of ancient Greece, whose impact was great thus latter scientists regard him as the authority. He put up the theory that the heavier things fall faster than the light things. This theory was not challenged until the famous Galileo's experiment which corrected false beliefs thus refined our understanding towards gravity. Many other things are no different, reminding us to acquire a more comprehensive understanding.
   
   So from a more objective/impartial perspective to explain this phenomenon, technology actually does not deteriorate the ability of humans to think for themselves. Following are two opinions to support. In each period of development, people have their own way to adapt their life, we can not say that our abilities are decreasing because we are no more like in the past that every thing may need to be arranged by ourselves. Now we face new problems in new era that are brought by new demands. The invention of vehicle frees us from tried work and short the distance between person to person, whereas this not mean our ability are deteriorated, we need to learn the technologies how to produce and maintain a car, how to handle it, and learning the complex traffic rules. As a result, with the more using of technologies, we are facing more new problems produced by these technics.

   Technologies precipitate the speed of social development, as long as we are proceeding, we will face more problems needed to be solved. This progress is more likely construction, a upper layer is lied upon the lower layer, different problems will emerge. Hence we own more spare time to solve more difficult problems, and enter into a advanced society.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

石头人123

新虫 (初入文坛)

一看开头,我就不想往下看了!

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2015-09-12 06:32:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 4 个回答

sustczz

银虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

好长。。。30分钟写完的?

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
2楼2014-03-23 00:57:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

化合态游离态

木虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by sustczz at 2014-03-23 00:57:30
好长。。。30分钟写完的?

没有,一个小时,菜鸟级别的
3楼2014-03-23 10:04:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +17 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 19/950 2026-08-30 22:24 by xiangy672
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +12 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 13/650 2026-08-29 00:04 by superceng
[基金申请] 系统查不到 +11 董八千 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 18:06 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +5 yuleib84 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 00:02 by yudaoqian88
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
信息提示
请填处理意见