| ²é¿´: 576 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | ||
Ó¢ÓÓ°Ó³Òø³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
°ïæ·Ò뼸¾ä»°£¬Ð»Ð»À²
|
|
|
1.The question of why and how firms¡¯ approach to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) differs across countries is one that can only be adequately addressed by giving a strong theoretical underpinning to research on comparative CSR. 2.We conclude with a brief discussion of the implications of our findings as a way of suggesting potential avenues for future research on comparative CSR. 3.CSR is embedded in the pre-existing social contract (or ¡®implied¡¯), covering many of the areas¡ªfrom environmental protection to health insurance, training, higher education, the arts and community services¡ªthat have been areas for corporate discretion in the USA, to be addressed explicitly if inclined ¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁÏר˶(0856) 339·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¹¤085600 331·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
268·Ö085602»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ìµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÖпÆÔº105500רҵ×Ü·Ö315Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ299ר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
086004 Çóµ÷¼Á 309
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
280Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
085400 328·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶322
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũ΢ÉúÎ288·Ö£¬ÈýÄêʵÑé¾Àú
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
739592694
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 3
- Ó¦Öú: 70 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 8815.5
- É¢½ð: 430
- ºì»¨: 12
- Ìû×Ó: 4627
- ÔÚÏß: 253.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1308351
- ×¢²á: 2011-05-28
- רҵ: ÓлúºÏ³É

2Â¥2014-03-12 15:35:13













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥