| ²é¿´: 572 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | ||
Ó¢ÓÓ°Ó³Òø³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
°ïæ·Ò뼸¾ä»°£¬Ð»Ð»À²
|
|
|
1.The question of why and how firms¡¯ approach to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) differs across countries is one that can only be adequately addressed by giving a strong theoretical underpinning to research on comparative CSR. 2.We conclude with a brief discussion of the implications of our findings as a way of suggesting potential avenues for future research on comparative CSR. 3.CSR is embedded in the pre-existing social contract (or ¡®implied¡¯), covering many of the areas¡ªfrom environmental protection to health insurance, training, higher education, the arts and community services¡ªthat have been areas for corporate discretion in the USA, to be addressed explicitly if inclined ¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
081700£¬311£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤085600 310·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤371Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
336²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤085600Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ334Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
331Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
332Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄϾ©º½¿Õº½Ìì´óѧ ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤329·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶322
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
739592694
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ·ÒëEPI: 3
- Ó¦Öú: 70 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 8815.5
- É¢½ð: 430
- ºì»¨: 12
- Ìû×Ó: 4627
- ÔÚÏß: 253.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1308351
- ×¢²á: 2011-05-28
- רҵ: ÓлúºÏ³É

2Â¥2014-03-12 15:35:13














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥