| 查看: 7042 | 回复: 30 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
libaosun木虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
SCI一审意见结果回来了，淡定不了喽！恳请各位大牛进来帮忙！ 已有1人参与
|
|
|
投的是elsevier旗下的Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy期刊。 编辑回信如下： Dear ****, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, especially address the comments of second reviewer, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/saa/ and login as an Author. 一共两个审稿人，审稿意见如下： Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This is a very interesting study on the synthesis and characterization of luminescent silver nanoclusters. **** et al. applied the BSA-directed strategy to synthesize silver nanoclusters, which are encapsulated inside the BSA molecules. The authors also provided a bunch of data characterizing the as-synthesized silver nanoclusters, showing some intriguing properties of the as-synthesized silver nanoclusters, which could be further applied in many practical applications. The product and protocol developed in this study are interesting, and will be of interest to researchers in many fields such as nanoclusters, luminescent materials, and nanomedicine. I am therefore very enthusiastic to recommend the acceptance of this paper after the authors address the following minor issues. Here are my comments. 1.Why the as-synthesized silver nanoclusters can show strong luminescence? Or where are these luminescence generated from the silver nanoclusters? Whether the luminescence is from the silver core or from the surface? Some recent studies on luminescent gold and silver nanoclusters (e.g., JACS 2014, 136, 1246; NPG Asia Materials 2013, 5, e39; JACS 2012, 134, 16662, and others) may provide useful information to answer this question. It will be good if the authors can discuss a little bit of the luminescence properties of ultrasmall metal nanoclusters, which could significantly improve the readability of this paper, especially to those readers with limited knowledge of metal nanoclusters. 2.The structures of the biotemplates, BSA, may also affect the size and physicochemical properties of silver nanoclusters. This effect reminds me one recent publication (Chemical Communications 2013, 49, 9740) on the discussing of the structure effect of BSA molecules on the size and physicochemical properties of as-synthesized metal nanoclusters. Reviewer #2: The research does not have high scientific quality, for example, (1) the quantum yield from the cluster at 750nm is less than 1% that of pure BSA itself (BSA is not a strong emission molecule), therefore make it not useful for any bioimaging application. (2) The claimed "upcoversion fluorescence" appears to be just to be comparable to the noise level. The paper is not suitable to be published here. 编辑只说让修改，没说大修还是小修，只是给了两个月的修改时间。不知道是错过了时间点了还是怎么回事，在投稿系统里我也看不到是小修还是大修。感觉无论如何第二个审稿人都会据稿。请问各位大牛们，这是什么节奏？接受的概率大不大？该怎么回复第二个审稿人呢？修回之后还会不会二审？编辑还会不会再邀请新的审稿人审稿？指望这篇论文毕业呢，恳请各位大牛帮帮忙！先谢过了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么国自然不能直接公布
已经有5人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有4人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 本人今年投了一篇2区的SCI，各位大神分析一下审稿意见
已经有22人回复
- 谁遇到过论文被拒但又可以重新投稿提交的情况
已经有11人回复
- Sci China Tech版，二审2个月了，还在awaiting ae recommendation
已经有1人回复
- 大家帮我看看这种情况该怎么办
已经有12人回复
- 论文2审大修，麻烦大家指点一下，还有希望么
已经有59人回复
- RSC Advances综述--minor revision
已经有32人回复
- 论文二审，等得焦急。。。
已经有10人回复
- 审稿意见如何回复，求助
已经有4人回复
- SCI投稿的一点体会
已经有80人回复
- 真的是“没有消息就是好消息”吗？（一审修回）
已经有162人回复
wangjun890
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1067 (博后)
- 金币: 21565.8
- 红花: 36
- 帖子: 6730
- 在线: 552.1小时
- 虫号: 575839
- 注册: 2008-06-19
- 专业: 催化化学
8楼2014-03-08 15:48:00
2楼2014-03-08 14:31:05
ee_xuhl
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 16 (小学生)
- 金币: 1995.7
- 散金: 643
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 683
- 在线: 103.6小时
- 虫号: 2495864
- 注册: 2013-06-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电气科学与工程
3楼2014-03-08 14:43:31
iSCIpapers
木虫 (正式写手)
大叔还年轻
- 应助: 105 (高中生)
- 金币: 2640.6
- 散金: 138
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 636
- 在线: 326.1小时
- 虫号: 3021647
- 注册: 2014-03-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
libaosun: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 多谢帮忙! 2014-03-10 10:43:17
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
libaosun: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 多谢帮忙! 2014-03-10 10:43:17
|
大改和小改有什么区别吗？ 第1个审稿人说 “a very interesting study” 和 “very enthusiastic to recommend the acceptance”，还提了一下具体的意见 第2个审稿意见比较mean，只是从两点说“does not have high scientific quality”，而且就这么干巴巴的2-3句话，但是或许这两点很重要 从编辑的信上看（语气），明显是给你机会 修改稿只要把这两点说明白了（比如说是不是可以再提高quantum yield，还有是不是可以提高upcoversion fluorescence的信号，可能需要补充一些实验和数据） 最重要的是要写好rebuttal letter 祝好运！ |
4楼2014-03-08 15:11:00
5