24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 6214  |  回复: 30
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

libaosun

木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] SCI一审意见结果回来了,淡定不了喽!恳请各位大牛进来帮忙!已有1人参与

投的是elsevier旗下的Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy期刊。
编辑回信如下:
       Dear ****,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, especially address the comments of second reviewer, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.  

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/saa/ and login as an Author.

一共两个审稿人,审稿意见如下:

Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: This is a very interesting study on the synthesis and characterization of luminescent silver nanoclusters. **** et al. applied the BSA-directed strategy to synthesize silver nanoclusters, which are encapsulated inside the BSA molecules. The authors also provided a bunch of data characterizing the as-synthesized silver nanoclusters, showing some intriguing properties of the as-synthesized silver nanoclusters, which could be further applied in many practical applications. The product and protocol developed in this study are interesting, and will be of interest to researchers in many fields such as nanoclusters, luminescent materials, and nanomedicine. I am therefore very enthusiastic to recommend the acceptance of this paper after the authors address the following minor issues.

Here are my comments.

1.Why the as-synthesized silver nanoclusters can show strong luminescence? Or where are these luminescence generated from the silver nanoclusters? Whether the luminescence is from the silver core or from the surface? Some recent studies on luminescent gold and silver nanoclusters (e.g., JACS 2014, 136, 1246; NPG Asia Materials 2013, 5, e39; JACS 2012, 134, 16662, and others) may provide useful information to answer this question. It will be good if the authors can discuss a little bit of the luminescence properties of ultrasmall metal nanoclusters, which could significantly improve the readability of this paper, especially to those readers with limited knowledge of metal nanoclusters.

2.The structures of the biotemplates, BSA, may also affect the size and physicochemical properties of silver nanoclusters. This effect reminds me one recent publication (Chemical Communications 2013, 49, 9740) on the discussing of the structure effect of BSA molecules on the size and physicochemical properties of as-synthesized metal nanoclusters.



Reviewer #2: The research does not have high scientific quality, for example, (1) the quantum yield from the cluster at 750nm is less than 1% that of pure BSA itself (BSA is not a strong emission molecule), therefore make it not useful for any bioimaging application. (2) The claimed "upcoversion fluorescence" appears to be just to be comparable to the noise level.  The paper is not suitable to be published here.


编辑只说让修改,没说大修还是小修,只是给了两个月的修改时间。不知道是错过了时间点了还是怎么回事,在投稿系统里我也看不到是小修还是大修。感觉无论如何第二个审稿人都会据稿。请问各位大牛们,这是什么节奏?接受的概率大不大?该怎么回复第二个审稿人呢?修回之后还会不会二审?编辑还会不会再邀请新的审稿人审稿?指望这篇论文毕业呢,恳请各位大牛帮帮忙!先谢过了!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

libaosun

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
14楼: Originally posted by edgexjy at 2014-03-09 16:02:33
祝楼主心想事成,万事如意,科研精进!祝楼主心想事成,万事如意,科研精进!

多谢你的祝福!
16楼2014-03-10 13:27:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

libaosun

木虫 (正式写手)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
17楼: Originally posted by luoxd00 at 2014-03-10 14:22:47
看comments,r1是正面的,r2是反面的。
问题回答得好,机会很大,文章将送到第三个审稿人手里,关键看第三人的意见le。
good luck。

多谢帮忙,但由于不是应助回帖,所以没办法发放金币,不好意思。送红花一朵,以表示感谢。
22楼2014-03-11 10:32:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

libaosun

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
23楼: Originally posted by great_077 at 2014-04-01 15:25:49
你好,我也在投J. Lumin.,但初审老是通不过,说格式不对,请问你投稿时的格式是怎么设置的?

我投的是SAA,不是J. Lumin.,格式的话按照期刊的作者须知应该就可以了吧,或者有不懂的地方请教一下格式编辑?祝好运!
25楼2014-04-01 20:42:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

libaosun

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
26楼: Originally posted by malenliu at 2014-07-06 15:28:34
应该Reviewer1给了接收,Reviewer2给了委婉的拒稿,但编辑倾向于了Reviewer1给了大修。
认真详细的进行修改吧,特别是对于Reviewer2提出的意见,在坚持自己观点的同时要给出详细和解释和委婉的说明。
只要有了大修 ...

多谢你的建议!感激不尽!
27楼2014-07-07 13:20:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

libaosun

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
28楼: Originally posted by xiaohu9711 at 2014-08-13 10:32:51
如果你要继续修改,就要好好对待每个审稿者的意见。不论是大修还是小修,从意见来看是大修。不过,很多文章都是第一次大修后再接收的。
尽管第二个人的意见不友好,但是要重视哦。

多谢你的建议,感激不尽!
30楼2014-08-13 20:35:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

libaosun

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
29楼: Originally posted by sdaucf at 2014-08-13 13:56:33
首先,你很幸运,编辑给你机会!!!珍惜!!其次:一定认真对待每个审稿人意见,逐一详细回答!!!特别是审稿人2.。。。你这肯定是大修。。。。但可喜的是,编辑还是想要这篇文章的,抓住机会,认真修改。。。。我 ...

多谢你的建议,感激不尽!
31楼2014-08-13 20:37:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 libaosun 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见