应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » SCI一审意见结果回来了，淡定不了喽！恳请各位大牛进来帮忙！
51/1返回列表
查看: 6176  |  回复: 30
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

libaosun

木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] SCI一审意见结果回来了，淡定不了喽！恳请各位大牛进来帮忙！已有1人参与

投的是elsevier旗下的Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy期刊。
编辑回信如下：
       Dear ****,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, especially address the comments of second reviewer, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.  

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/saa/ and login as an Author.

一共两个审稿人，审稿意见如下：

Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: This is a very interesting study on the synthesis and characterization of luminescent silver nanoclusters. **** et al. applied the BSA-directed strategy to synthesize silver nanoclusters, which are encapsulated inside the BSA molecules. The authors also provided a bunch of data characterizing the as-synthesized silver nanoclusters, showing some intriguing properties of the as-synthesized silver nanoclusters, which could be further applied in many practical applications. The product and protocol developed in this study are interesting, and will be of interest to researchers in many fields such as nanoclusters, luminescent materials, and nanomedicine. I am therefore very enthusiastic to recommend the acceptance of this paper after the authors address the following minor issues.

Here are my comments.

1.Why the as-synthesized silver nanoclusters can show strong luminescence? Or where are these luminescence generated from the silver nanoclusters? Whether the luminescence is from the silver core or from the surface? Some recent studies on luminescent gold and silver nanoclusters (e.g., JACS 2014, 136, 1246; NPG Asia Materials 2013, 5, e39; JACS 2012, 134, 16662, and others) may provide useful information to answer this question. It will be good if the authors can discuss a little bit of the luminescence properties of ultrasmall metal nanoclusters, which could significantly improve the readability of this paper, especially to those readers with limited knowledge of metal nanoclusters.

2.The structures of the biotemplates, BSA, may also affect the size and physicochemical properties of silver nanoclusters. This effect reminds me one recent publication (Chemical Communications 2013, 49, 9740) on the discussing of the structure effect of BSA molecules on the size and physicochemical properties of as-synthesized metal nanoclusters.



Reviewer #2: The research does not have high scientific quality, for example, (1) the quantum yield from the cluster at 750nm is less than 1% that of pure BSA itself (BSA is not a strong emission molecule), therefore make it not useful for any bioimaging application. (2) The claimed "upcoversion fluorescence" appears to be just to be comparable to the noise level.  The paper is not suitable to be published here.


编辑只说让修改，没说大修还是小修，只是给了两个月的修改时间。不知道是错过了时间点了还是怎么回事，在投稿系统里我也看不到是小修还是大修。感觉无论如何第二个审稿人都会据稿。请问各位大牛们，这是什么节奏？接受的概率大不大？该怎么回复第二个审稿人呢？修回之后还会不会二审？编辑还会不会再邀请新的审稿人审稿？指望这篇论文毕业呢，恳请各位大牛帮帮忙！先谢过了！
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2014-03-08 14:29:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hopper_yang

新虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
libaosun: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 多谢帮忙！ 2014-03-10 13:12:04
根据我最近投稿的经验，这种情况应该属于让你修改后再次提交修改稿，然后编辑会根据你修改的稿子确定最终是否录用。当然这种情况主要是针对评审2提出的比较尖锐的问题，你要根据审稿人意见写一个详细的cover letter，同时包括review1
和review2，当然要重点对reviewer2的意见给予回复。回复最好以逐条形式进行。因为跨行，所以无法对内容进行更多的建议，但是主要原则是，如果能在两个月内补充的内容一定要按审稿人意见补充，如果不能在2月内完成的内容就明确说没有完成，正在进行。如果审稿人要你从根本上调整工作思路，这时必须用合理的解释让审稿人明白你做的工作是有意义的，坚决不能从根本上改动，因为这是否定你当前所正在进行的工作。总之，在修改上要逐条对应审稿人意见，仔细修改或解释。修改或应对要诚实，不能以抱着糊弄的心态，因为对方都是比你高出不知道几个层次的行家。一点点弄虚作假人家都看的出来。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
6楼2014-03-08 15:45:41
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 31 个回答

匿名

用户注销 (正式写手)
★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
libaosun: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢帮忙！ 2014-03-10 10:38:52
本帖仅楼主可见
赞一下
2楼2014-03-08 14:31:05
 已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

ee_xuhl

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
libaosun: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助, 多谢帮忙！ 2014-03-10 10:54:47
好好改改，总体Positive!
赞一下 回复此楼
优秀是一种习惯
3楼2014-03-08 14:43:31
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

iSCIpapers

木虫 (正式写手)

大叔还年轻

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
libaosun: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 多谢帮忙! 2014-03-10 10:43:17
大改和小改有什么区别吗？

第1个审稿人说 “a very interesting study” 和 “very enthusiastic to recommend the acceptance”，还提了一下具体的意见
第2个审稿意见比较mean，只是从两点说“does not have high scientific quality”，而且就这么干巴巴的2-3句话，但是或许这两点很重要

从编辑的信上看（语气），明显是给你机会
修改稿只要把这两点说明白了（比如说是不是可以再提高quantum yield，还有是不是可以提高upcoversion fluorescence的信号，可能需要补充一些实验和数据）

最重要的是要写好rebuttal letter
祝好运！
赞一下(3人) 回复此楼
4楼2014-03-08 15:11:00
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 31 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭