| 查看: 1413 | 回复: 3 | |||
[交流]
编辑completely rejected，但审稿人建议reformulate and resubmit,怎么弄？ 已有1人参与
|
|
review 1:............ ...............................(2000字) The English is unacceptable. As the major reviewer, I strongly recommend the authors to reformuate and resubmit the paper after considering most of the above comments. review2:....（300字） The work is closer to a conference proceeding than to a research paper. The English language is not clear enough to understand some parts of the text and it needs to be improved. I encourage the authors to extend the analysis and the discussion on...Due to the above-mentioned reasons I suggest to reject the paper. Any modification of the manuscript would not either be suitable for the journal publication. In my opinion the work has to be reformulated, showing a very detailed validation and analysis. Moreover, the scientific contents must be improved, to be considered for publication in a new form. 这个评价算是怎样? 可能性大么？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有16人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有19人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Acta Materialia 审稿意见已经出来，这种情况是否适合继续修改后重投？？
已经有25人回复
- GRSL从Major Revision到Reject and Resubmit，悲剧！
已经有5人回复
- 只知道稿件编号不知道编辑，resubmit的时候能分给原来的审稿人吗？
已经有11人回复
- reject and resubmit
已经有13人回复
- 关于reject with invitation to resubmit
已经有13人回复
- Revise and Resubmit 之后审稿还是原来审稿人吗
已经有9人回复
- 有没有两个审稿人一个拒，一个大修，然后编辑reject但是可以resubmit
已经有16人回复
2楼2014-03-07 20:55:49
qhd511
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 324 (大学生)
- 金币: 6915.3
- 散金: 226
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 1922
- 在线: 390.1小时
- 虫号: 1079710
- 注册: 2010-08-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境分析化学
3楼2014-03-07 21:00:50
4楼2014-03-07 21:06:27