| 查看: 3162 | 回复: 27 | |||
| 本帖产生 4 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
00waterh木虫 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
[activity] Do you agree that the government should support?
|
||
|
the title as you have seen is from TOFEL, i do know you guys like writing. and i am trying to practice my writing skill too. if you'd like to do the same, i hope you can post your writing here, let's improve our English together. here is the topic: Do you agree that the government should support the scientific research even there is no practical use? use specific reasons and examples to support your idea. and the rule is: write it by yourself i really hope you guys can take part in. considering of the time, i hope we can finish it before this weekend.  [ Last edited by 00waterh on 2014-3-4 at 22:07 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有4人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有16人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有19人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
00waterh
木虫 (知名作家)
- ESEPI: 36
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.936
- 金币: 4731.7
- 散金: 9439
- 红花: 81
- 沙发: 42
- 帖子: 6185
- 在线: 939.2小时
- 虫号: 2129944
- 注册: 2012-11-16
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 神经科学、认知科学与心理
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
00waterh: 回帖置顶 2014-03-07 13:51:24
Lopemann: 金币+30, Nice to see your work! 2014-03-07 20:47:48
Lopemann: ESEPI+1, Yes I support it. 2014-03-07 20:48:16
00waterh: 回帖置顶 2014-03-07 13:51:24
Lopemann: 金币+30, Nice to see your work! 2014-03-07 20:47:48
Lopemann: ESEPI+1, Yes I support it. 2014-03-07 20:48:16
|
i do agree that the Gov should support the research even there is no practical use. it's reasonable that Gov prefer supporting the researches which can bring the large benefits immediately, for we know such support usually would see its function at a short term,also would fulfill the Gov's will knowing their support is worth of it. as a result, researchers are demanded to specify the economic value of their projects(by which how much money can it bring to the society) when they apply for the fund. last year, five fund applications of our lab were hand in to the decision-maker, only one was past just for it has more practical use. there i truly hope the Gov can think over and over about how to define 'practical'? and forget my offensive to inquiry that does 'no practical use' means no use? as some worms have mentioned above that most of time there is really hard to find a way to see whether some researches have the practical use or not. so at least it seems to me that the practical use people called is by the short sight.if researchers haven't taken a long time to monitor the various index of forest, how can we know forest is of great importance to the weather change. if so,should we cut down the fund for such kinda research just for it's labeled with no practical use? the Gov should support the research if the research is meaningful for us. not just for us, but also for descendants. i personally don't want to see more rivers are polluted for the project is having practical use.and the PM 2.5 is higher than yesterday just because some 'no practical use' researches have been killed. if some researches would make more people afford their house,but low down the life quality of whole creature in this world. will you support it? i have my idea there. [ Last edited by 00waterh on 2014-3-7 at 20:51 ] |
26楼2014-03-07 13:47:11
2楼2014-03-04 22:15:49
mac194
铁虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 7
- 应助: 128 (高中生)
- 金币: 21401.3
- 红花: 101
- 帖子: 3332
- 在线: 3370.2小时
- 虫号: 2488597
- 注册: 2013-05-30
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型
★ ★ ★ ★
00waterh: 金币+4, thanks for your sharing~ 2014-03-05 18:45:30
00waterh: 金币+4, thanks for your sharing~ 2014-03-05 18:45:30
|
Pro: (EX: http://healthresearchfunding.org/gene-patenting-pros-cons/) "Government should fund scientific research because no private company should be allowed to patent the fruits of scientific research." Con: (EX: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol2/iss1/12/) "Government should not fund controversial scientific research, even if its practical benefits are immediate and beyond doubt." ![[activity] Do you agree that the government should support?](https://muchongimg.xmcimg.com/data/bcs/2014/0305/w133h2488597_1393973695_771.jpg#opennewwindow) The Case Against Federal Funding.jpg |
3楼2014-03-05 06:55:52
mac194
铁虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 7
- 应助: 128 (高中生)
- 金币: 21401.3
- 红花: 101
- 帖子: 3332
- 在线: 3370.2小时
- 虫号: 2488597
- 注册: 2013-05-30
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型
|
FYI: (You are welcome!) http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/r ... -stress-and-repair/ -------------------------------------------- ![[activity] Do you agree that the government should support?-1](https://muchongimg.xmcimg.com/data/bcs/2014/0305/w128h2488597_1393974762_292.jpg#opennewwindow) Stem Cell Research Breakthrough.jpg |
4楼2014-03-05 07:12:54