24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 300  |  回复: 4
【奖励】 本帖被评价4次,作者yalefield增加金币 4
当前主题已经存档。

[资源] The Trouble with QSAR

(or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace Fallacy)
Stephen R. Johnson*
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co.,
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 25-26

Abstract: A general feeling of disillusionment with QSAR has settled across the modeling community in recent years. Most practitioners seem to agree that QSAR has not fulfilled the expectations set for its ability to predict
biological activity. Among the possible reasons that have been proposed recently for this disappointment are chance correlation, rough response surfaces, incorrect functional forms, and overtraining. Undoubtedly, each of these plays an important role in the lack of predictivity seen in most QSAR models. Likely to be just as important is the role of the fallacy cum hoc ergo propter hoc in the poor prediction seen with many QSAR models. By embracing fallacy along with an over reliance on statistical inference, it may well be that the manner in which QSAR is practiced is more responsible for its lack of success than any other innate cause.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aydxhsg

金虫 (正式写手)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

好好好
顶顶顶...........
2楼2008-01-29 10:11:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yalefield 的主题更新
☆ 无星级 ★ 一星级 ★★★ 三星级 ★★★★★ 五星级
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见