| 查看: 307 | 回复: 4 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价4次，作者yalefield增加金币 4 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
The Trouble with QSAR
|
||
|
(or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace Fallacy) Stephen R. Johnson* Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 25-26 Abstract: A general feeling of disillusionment with QSAR has settled across the modeling community in recent years. Most practitioners seem to agree that QSAR has not fulfilled the expectations set for its ability to predict biological activity. Among the possible reasons that have been proposed recently for this disappointment are chance correlation, rough response surfaces, incorrect functional forms, and overtraining. Undoubtedly, each of these plays an important role in the lack of predictivity seen in most QSAR models. Likely to be just as important is the role of the fallacy cum hoc ergo propter hoc in the poor prediction seen with many QSAR models. By embracing fallacy along with an over reliance on statistical inference, it may well be that the manner in which QSAR is practiced is more responsible for its lack of success than any other innate cause. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
求标准粉末衍射卡号 ICDD 01-076-1802
已经有0人回复
-
新西兰Robinson研究所招收全奖PhD
已经有0人回复
-
物理学I论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有235人回复
-
石墨烯转移--二氧化硅衬底石墨烯
已经有0人回复
-
笼目材料中量子自旋液体基态的证据
已经有0人回复
-
数学教学论硕士可以读数学物理博士吗？
已经有0人回复
-
德国亥姆霍兹Hereon中心汉堡分部招镁合金腐蚀裂变SCC课题方向2026公派博士生
已经有4人回复
-
澳门大学 应用物理及材料工程研究院 潘晖教授课题组诚招博士后
已经有11人回复
-
求助NH4V4O10晶体的CIF文件
已经有0人回复
2楼2008-01-29 10:11:20