| 查看: 389 | 回复: 4 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价4次，作者yalefield增加金币 4 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
The Trouble with QSAR
|
||
|
(or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace Fallacy) Stephen R. Johnson* Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 25-26 Abstract: A general feeling of disillusionment with QSAR has settled across the modeling community in recent years. Most practitioners seem to agree that QSAR has not fulfilled the expectations set for its ability to predict biological activity. Among the possible reasons that have been proposed recently for this disappointment are chance correlation, rough response surfaces, incorrect functional forms, and overtraining. Undoubtedly, each of these plays an important role in the lack of predictivity seen in most QSAR models. Likely to be just as important is the role of the fallacy cum hoc ergo propter hoc in the poor prediction seen with many QSAR models. By embracing fallacy along with an over reliance on statistical inference, it may well be that the manner in which QSAR is practiced is more responsible for its lack of success than any other innate cause. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
求助中医院临床中医中标的青年标书学习，谢谢
已经有5人回复
-
浙大物院表面物理课题组长期招收普博及直博学生
已经有259人回复
-
物理学I论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有96人回复
-
【征稿】Springer Nature热电专题 Discover Materials / Discover Chemistry
已经有47人回复
-
25届硕士申请，材料计算方向
已经有2人回复
-
课题组招1-2名硕士
已经有1人回复
-
机时越来越贵之后，我把一部分 DFT 流程搬到了 AI 计算平台上
已经有0人回复
-
斯坦福大学与Elsevier世界前2%学者新排名查询
已经有1人回复
-
27申博推荐：南京航空航天大学国际前沿院光学方向招收博士生！
已经有19人回复
-
华南师范大学+双一流学科物理学+广东省杰青团队2027年博士招生+机器学习驱动材料设计
已经有0人回复
2楼2008-01-29 10:11:20