²é¿´: 238  |  »Ø¸´: 5
µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ­´æµµ¡£
µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû

liuxingyu

Í­³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)

[½»Á÷] ´ó·Ö×ӵįÀÉóÒâ¼û£¬°ïæ¿´¿´Ê²Ã´Òâ˼£¬20½ð±Ò´ðл

The authors rely heavily on 1HNMR characterization. For quantification this is not always appropriate. End groups are small and often shielded by larger resonances.

PEO-TEMPO and PCL-TEMPO should therefore also be analyzed by MALDI MS In fig 6 and more particularly Fig 9, a clear shoulder and low molecular weight fraction are visible in the trace of the triblock copolymers. This raises doubts over the complete formation and purity of the triblock copolymer.  Most appropriate would be to analyze the samples with 2D chromatography. Another option would be to treat the samples with scavenger resin (azide and alkyne functional Merrifield resin for removal of unreacted alkynes and azides.)



What is the yield of the triblock copolymers after work up?



The triblock coupling efficiency as is calculated should be reformulated to show the ratio between the different blocks. This gives much more valuable information, because it can show the efficiency  of both coupling procedures. The calculation procedure can be shifted to the suppl. info.



Why is the reaction performed at 90¡ãC? This one pot procedure could in principle also be performed at lower temperatures, which would yield another benefit toward other procedures. This experiment is strongly recommended. If it has already been investigated, then a comment on temperature effects should be included.



For the one-pot procedure one equivalent of CuBr is used, which is in principle fully used by ATRNC. This could lead to problems with the click chemistry coupling. The authors should comment about this (is click chemistry much faster than ATRNC?, have they investigated different ratios of CuBr?).
²»Ò»ÑùµÄÈËÉú£¬Ã¿Ìì²»Ò»ÑùµÄÄ㣡
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

lovehappy2008

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)

¡ï
liuxingyu(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):ллÀ²£¡
2D chromatography Ó¦¸Ã¾ÍÊǶþάÆ×°É
Ò»°ãµÄÆ×ͼ¶¼ÊǶþάµÄ£¬¿ÉÄܾÍÊÇÒªÄ㲹һЩÏà¹ØµÄ²âÊÔ

[ Last edited by lovehappy2008 on 2008-1-22 at 00:15 ]
¼Ù×÷ÕæÊ±ÕæÒà¼ÙÎÞΪÓд¦Óл¹ÎÞ
5Â¥2008-01-22 00:10:04
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
²é¿´È«²¿ 6 ¸ö»Ø´ð

xjxlovelxl

ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)

CA-FANS

Äõ½·­ÒëÇóÖúÄÇÎÊÎÊ
¡¾¹«¸æ£ºÓн±ÎÊ´ð°æ½ûÖ¹¹àË®¡¿
2Â¥2008-01-21 12:06:11
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

lovehappy2008

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)

¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
liuxingyu(½ð±Ò+4,VIP+0):2D chromatography ÊÇʲô²âÊÔѽ£¿Õâ¸ö²»¶®Ñ½
1 The authors rely heavily on 1HNMR characterization. For quantification this is not always appropriate. End groups are small and often shielded by larger resonances.
Ã²ËÆÊÇ˵ÄãµÄ²âÊÔ½á¹û½ö¿¿1HNMRÈ·¶¨ÊÇÔ¶Ô¶²»¹»µÄ£¬»¹Ðè×÷MALDI MS ºÍ
2D chromatography

2  What is the yield of the triblock copolymers after work up?
ÐèÒª¼ÆËãһϲúÂÊ

3Why is the reaction performed at 90¡ãC?
ÓÐûÓиü¼ÓºÏÊʵķ´Ó¦Ìõ¼þ
ÓÐûÓÐÊÔ¹ý different ratios of CuBr

ÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¬Ó¦¸ÃÊÇÒªÄ㲹һЩÊý¾Ý

[ Last edited by lovehappy2008 on 2008-1-21 at 12:40 ]
¼Ù×÷ÕæÊ±ÕæÒà¼ÙÎÞΪÓд¦Óл¹ÎÞ
3Â¥2008-01-21 12:38:06
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

yfliu

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
liuxingyu(½ð±Ò+15,VIP+0):Çë½ÌÒ»ÏÂ2D É«Æ×ÊÇʲô²âÊÔѽ£¿Äܲ»ÄÜÏêϸ˵Ã÷˵Ã÷ѽ£¿Ôõô×ö£¿
The authors rely heavily on 1HNMR characterization. For quantification this is not always appropriate. End groups are small and often shielded by larger resonances.
×÷Õß¹ýÓÚÒÀÀµ1HNMR±íÕ÷¡£¶Ë»ù½ÏС£¬³£±»´óµÄ¹²ÕñÐźÅËùÕڸǡ£

PEO-TEMPO and PCL-TEMPO should therefore also be analyzed by MALDI MS In fig 6 and more particularly Fig 9, a clear shoulder and low molecular weight fraction are visible in the trace of the triblock copolymers. This raises doubts over the complete formation and purity of the triblock copolymer.  Most appropriate would be to analyze the samples with 2D chromatography. Another option would be to treat the samples with scavenger resin (azide and alkyne functional Merrifield resin for removal of unreacted alkynes and azides.)
ͼ6ÖУ¬PEO-TEMPOºÍPCL-TEMPOÓ¦¸ÃÔÙÓÃMALDI MS ·ÖÎö¡£ÌرðÊÇͼ9£¬ÔÚºÛÁ¿µÄÈýǶ¶Î¹²¾ÛÎïÖÐÓÐÃ÷ÏԵļç·åºÍµÍ·Ö×ÓÁ¿²¿·Ö¡£Õâ²»½ûʹÈË»³ÒÉÈýǶ¶Î¹²¾ÛÎïÊÇ·ñÉú³ÉÍêÈ«£¬Æä´¿¶ÈÈçºÎ¡£×îºÃÓÃ2D É«Æ×½øÐзÖÎö¡£ÆäËû¿ÉÑ¡·½·¨»¹ÓÐÓôó¿×Ê÷Ö¬´¦ÀíÑùÆ·£¨ÓõþµªÈ²ÐÍMerrifield¹¦ÄÜÊ÷֬ȥ³ýδ·´Ó¦µÄȲºÍµþµª»¯ºÏÎ

What is the yield of the triblock copolymers after work up?
ºÏ³ÉºóÈýǶ¶Î¹²¾ÛÎïµÄ²úÂÊÈçºÎ£¿


The triblock coupling efficiency as is calculated should be reformulated to show the ratio between the different blocks. This gives much more valuable information, because it can show the efficiency  of both coupling procedures. The calculation procedure can be shifted to the suppl. info.
¼ÆËãµÄÈýǶ¶ÎñîºÏЧÂÊÓ¦¸ÃÔÙÓù«Ê½±íʾÆäÓ벻ͬǶ¶Î±ÈµÄ¹ØÏµ¡£ÕâÑù¿ÉÒÔ·´Ó³Á½ÖÖñîºÏ¹ý³ÌµÄЧÂÊ£¬ÄÜÌṩ¸üÓмÛÖµµÄÐÅÏ¢¡£¼ÆËã¹ý³Ì¿ÉÒÔÖÃÓÚ¸½Â¼ÖС£


Why is the reaction performed at 90¡ãC? This one pot procedure could in principle also be performed at lower temperatures, which would yield another benefit toward other procedures. This experiment is strongly recommended. If it has already been investigated, then a comment on temperature effects should be included.
·´Ó¦Î¶ÈΪʲôѡ¶¨90¡ãC£¿ÕâÖÖÒ»¹ø·¨´ÓÔ­ÀíÉϽ²¿ÉÒÔÔڽϵ͵ÄζÈϽøÐУ¬ÓëÆäËû¹ý³Ì±È£¬¿ÉÒÔÓÐÁíÒ»ÖÖÓÅÊÆ¡£Ç¿ÁÒÍÆ¼öÕâÑùµÄʵÑé¡£Èç¹ûÒѾ­Ñо¿ÁË£¬Ó¦¸Ã°üÀ¨Î¶ȵÄÓ°Ïì¡£


For the one-pot procedure one equivalent of CuBr is used, which is in principle fully used by ATRNC. This could lead to problems with the click chemistry coupling. The authors should comment about this (is click chemistry much faster than ATRNC?, have they investigated different ratios of CuBr?).
Ò»¹ø·¨ÖеÈÁ¿µÄCuBr£¬Ô­ÀíÉϽ²»áΪATRNCÍêÈ«ÓÃÍ꣬Õâ»á²úÉú¡°µã»÷»¯Ñ§¡±ñîºÏÎÊÌâ¡£×÷ÕßÓ¦¶Ô´Ë½øÐÐÆÀ¼Û£¨µã»÷»¯Ñ§ÊÇ·ñ±ÈATRNC¸ü¿ì£¿ÊÇ·ñ×öÁ˲»Í¬±ÈÀýµÄCuBr£¿£©¡£
ÐËȤÊÇÆðµã,ÇÚ·ÜÊÇÆÌµæ
4Â¥2008-01-21 21:05:43
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 289Çóµ÷¼Á +7 »³èªÎÕè¤l 2026-03-20 7/350 2026-03-22 15:57 by ColorlessPI
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤£¨0856£©304ÇóBÇøµ÷¼Á +3 Çñgl 2026-03-20 7/350 2026-03-21 19:05 by 15709483992
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¹¤¿Æ0856Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ãåÎö͡͡ 2026-03-21 3/150 2026-03-21 18:30 by ѧԱ8dgXkO
[¿¼ÑÐ] 311Çóµ÷¼Á +3 Ó¸ҵÄСÎâ 2026-03-20 3/150 2026-03-21 17:40 by ColorlessPI
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÖØÇì´óѧ085700×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³×Ü·Ö308Çóµ÷¼Á +7 īīĮ 2026-03-20 7/350 2026-03-21 16:36 by barlinike
[¿¼ÑÐ] 279Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ºìÒÂÒþ¹Ù 2026-03-21 5/250 2026-03-21 14:59 by lature00
[¿¼ÑÐ] »úеר˶299Çóµ÷¼ÁÖÁ²ÄÁÏ +3 kkcoco25 2026-03-16 4/200 2026-03-21 03:52 by JourneyLucky
[¿¼ÑÐ] 070300»¯Ñ§319Çóµ÷¼Á +7 ½õÀð0909 2026-03-17 7/350 2026-03-21 03:46 by JourneyLucky
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷ÄϽ»´ó£¬Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ²Ä»¯ÖðÃÎÈË 2026-03-18 5/250 2026-03-21 00:26 by JourneyLucky
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏרҵÇóµ÷¼Á +6 hanamiko 2026-03-18 6/300 2026-03-21 00:24 by JourneyLucky
[¿¼ÑÐ] 22408 344·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ »ªµç¼ÆËã»ú¼¼Êõ +4 solanXXX 2026-03-20 4/200 2026-03-20 23:49 by alg094825
[¿¼ÑÐ] 330Çóµ÷¼Á +4 С²Ä»¯±¾¿Æ 2026-03-18 4/200 2026-03-20 23:13 by JourneyLucky
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄϾ©Àí¹¤´óѧ085701×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³302·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +4 ¿ûè÷ÎÀ¶Ó 2026-03-18 6/300 2026-03-20 23:02 by JourneyLucky
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶µ÷¼Á +7 heming3743 2026-03-16 7/350 2026-03-20 19:31 by zhukairuo
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶µ÷¼Á +5 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 6/300 2026-03-18 22:55 by 204818@lcx
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¡¾Í¬¼ÃÈí¼þ¡¿Èí¼þ£¨085405£©¿¼ÑÐÇóµ÷¼Á +3 2026eternal 2026-03-18 3/150 2026-03-18 19:09 by ²«»÷518
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÊÕ¸´ÊÔµ÷¼ÁÉú +4 ÓêºóÇïºÉ 2026-03-18 4/200 2026-03-18 14:16 by elevennnne
[¿¼ÑÐ] 334Çóµ÷¼Á +3 Ö¾´æ¸ßÔ¶ÒâÔÚ»úÐ 2026-03-16 3/150 2026-03-18 08:34 by lm4875102
[ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å] ÓÐûÓдóÀз¢Ð¡ÂÛÎÄÄÜ´øÎÒ¸ö¶þ×÷ +3 ÔöÈñ©ÈË 2026-03-17 4/200 2026-03-17 09:26 by xs74101122
[¿¼ÑÐ] 333Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ÎÄ˼¿Í 2026-03-16 7/350 2026-03-16 18:21 by ÎÄ˼¿Í
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û