24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

qtech_he

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 23 (小学生)
金币: 84.3
帖子: 831
在线: 188.8小时
虫号: 2819294

[交流] 大年初二的时候，写了论文申辩信

大年初一收到编辑给的意见：
一个审稿人说：论文的主题没有意义，拒稿；另一个审稿人说是非常有意义，录用。
于是，拒稿，这让人很伤心，于是写了一封申辩信，希望审稿人1给出合理的评审意见。
期待能够收到合理的申辩结果。

特此散金币，求祝福！

请不要只发表情，因为你也有可能遇到这样的问题，而束手无策

[ Last edited by qtech_he on 2014-2-2 at 10:10 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

有没有人能给点建议已经有5人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求已经有12人回复
实验室接单子已经有7人回复
全日制（定向）博士已经有5人回复
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？已经有4人回复
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期已经有4人回复
参与限项已经有3人回复
对氯苯硼酸纯化已经有3人回复
所感已经有4人回复
要不要辞职读博？已经有7人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2014-02-02 09:58:46

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

qtech_he

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 23 (小学生)
金币: 84.3
帖子: 831
在线: 188.8小时
虫号: 2819294

引用回帖:

52楼: Originally posted by John_5V5 at 2014-02-02 11:52:04
新年新气象，祝福楼主，新年快乐！

申诉信希望比较小。
Dear Professor M. Jefferson,

Thanks for your reading this letter firstly.

I am the corresponding author of the paper “**” , which was rejected this day. Thank you for your kind attention to consider our work in ##. I am terribly sorry for such a terrible conclusion made by the reviewer.

I know the reviewer 1 have done much work in reviewing my paper, but I think there must be some misunderstanding in the review process. So, I should give a rebuttal against the comments of the reviewer one. I have not been persuaded and I consider the comments are unreasonable and unfair for our work. I don’t know why the reviewer gave such nasty comments and made a so terrible conclusion about our future work. I doubt whether he has read our manuscript carefully and completely or not.

Thus, our team is writing this letter to make some explanation about the comments of reviewer 1. The responses are listed as follows.