| 查看: 4013 | 回复: 71 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
大年初二的时候，写了论文申辩信
|
|||
|
大年初一收到编辑给的意见： 一个审稿人说：论文的主题没有意义，拒稿；另一个审稿人说是非常有意义，录用。 于是，拒稿，这让人很伤心，于是写了一封申辩信，希望审稿人1给出合理的评审意见。 期待能够收到合理的申辩结果。 特此散金币，求祝福！ 请不要只发表情，因为你也有可能遇到这样的问题，而束手无策 [ Last edited by qtech_he on 2014-2-2 at 10:10 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么国自然不能直接公布
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有7人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有4人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
|
申诉信希望比较小。 Dear Professor M. Jefferson, Thanks for your reading this letter firstly. I am the corresponding author of the paper “**” , which was rejected this day. Thank you for your kind attention to consider our work in ##. I am terribly sorry for such a terrible conclusion made by the reviewer. I know the reviewer 1 have done much work in reviewing my paper, but I think there must be some misunderstanding in the review process. So, I should give a rebuttal against the comments of the reviewer one. I have not been persuaded and I consider the comments are unreasonable and unfair for our work. I don’t know why the reviewer gave such nasty comments and made a so terrible conclusion about our future work. I doubt whether he has read our manuscript carefully and completely or not. Thus, our team is writing this letter to make some explanation about the comments of reviewer 1. The responses are listed as follows. |
59楼2014-02-04 09:47:28
5楼2014-02-02 10:01:36
8楼2014-02-02 10:08:18
10楼2014-02-02 10:12:14
简单回复
2014-02-02 09:59
回复
qtech_he(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1 [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
pzx10044楼
2014-02-02 10:00
回复
qtech_he(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 [ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
wdxmu7楼
2014-02-02 10:05
回复
qtech_he(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福！ [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
20
