| 查看: 1954 | 回复: 14 | ||||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||||
Lopemann荣誉版主 (职业作家)
聽真那自由在奏鳴
|
[交流]
【activity】Paraphrase practice four
|
|||||
|
Today our sentences are: Drinking not always causes violence, but drinking is linked to the probability of attack from the partner and the severity of attack, as we all know. All the paraphrase practice will be put in the folder "English Writing" Feel free to subscribe it. http://muchong.com/bbs/taotie.php?action=view&ttid=46562 I will give you guys a sentence or sentences on a regular basis. Basically these sentences have some deficits and what I expect you guys to do is to eliminate deficits as you can. You can add more details, you can do some replacements, and you can do anything you want. As long as you post your version here, I will give you some BBs. For good translations, I will highlight them. And of course I will post my own version here. My translation: While we cannot draw a near casual line between drinking and violence, we know enough to show that alcohol has enough of an influence on behaviour to increase both the risk of experiencing an assault from a violent partner, and how severe that assault will be. Translations given by people actively involved in: @talkthisover A prevalent notion is that despite fact that drinking may not definitely lead crime, being drank might be remarkably correlated with assault from buds or serious violence. @winter_north Drinking does not always cause violence, but drinking is linked to the probability of attack from partners and severe attacks, as we all know. @mac194 Drinking DOES not always cause violence, but IT DOES increase the likelihood of fighting (and serious injury) during live sporting events @00waterh Drinking is not always causing violence, but linked to the probability of attack from the partner and the severity of attack, as we all know. @222秦时明月 As we know,drinking does not always cause violence,but it is linked to severe attacks and the probability of attacks on the partner. [ Last edited by Lopemann on 2014-2-2 at 06:16 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 English Writing |
» 猜你喜欢
为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果
已经有4人回复
-
基金中了
已经有15人回复
-
帮忙看看fileCode
已经有8人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有3人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有15人回复
-
filecode
已经有8人回复
-
确定了，国自然21号放榜
已经有7人回复
-
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分？
已经有11人回复
-
关于代码变化问题，想知道的进来
已经有24人回复
-
静等基金结果
已经有16人回复
mac194
铁虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 7
- 应助: 128 (高中生)
- 金币: 21401.3
- 红花: 101
- 帖子: 3332
- 在线: 3370.2小时
- 虫号: 2488597
- 注册: 2013-05-30
- 专业: 高分子材料的加工与成型
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Lopemann: 金币+5, Good emphasis. 2014-02-01 05:55:08
Lopemann: 回帖置顶 2014-02-01 05:55:10
Lopemann: 金币+5, Good emphasis. 2014-02-01 05:55:08
Lopemann: 回帖置顶 2014-02-01 05:55:10
|
Drinking DOES not always cause violence, but IT DOES increase the likelihood of fighting (and serious injury) during live sporting events 1st DOES = correction // 2nd DOES = for emphasis (I usually avoid using pronouns, but thought the IT is appropriate for emphasis) "as we all know" sounds opinionated and disparaging. I prefer to cite examples like "live sporting events" ( Thanks for the exercise I hope those coming after me can respond to mine as well as your entry ) |
3楼2014-01-31 22:29:04
winter_north
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- ESEPI: 113
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.321
- 金币: 5432.5
- 散金: 1975
- 红花: 46
- 沙发: 21
- 帖子: 4853
- 在线: 932.6小时
- 虫号: 1567257
- 注册: 2012-01-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 污染控制化学
2楼2014-01-31 22:17:53
Lopemann
荣誉版主 (职业作家)
聽真那自由在奏鳴
-
专家经验: +184 - ESEPI: 55
- 应助: 18 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.779
- 金币: 1112.7
- 散金: 2024
- 红花: 29
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 4528
- 在线: 597.3小时
- 虫号: 1932129
- 注册: 2012-08-09
- 专业: 应用数学方法
- 管辖: English Cafe
4楼2014-02-01 05:55:34
Lopemann
荣誉版主 (职业作家)
聽真那自由在奏鳴
-
专家经验: +184 - ESEPI: 55
- 应助: 18 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.779
- 金币: 1112.7
- 散金: 2024
- 红花: 29
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 4528
- 在线: 597.3小时
- 虫号: 1932129
- 注册: 2012-08-09
- 专业: 应用数学方法
- 管辖: English Cafe
5楼2014-02-01 05:56:37
100