24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3117  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

雨荷听秋

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 投稿Elsevier期刊,编辑回邮件了,有不明白的地方,请大家帮忙看看~ 已有7人参与

前几天投了一篇文章,Elsevier期刊,编辑先用iThenticate软件进行查重,发现和我之前发表的一篇文章有些重复的地方,就发了一封邮件,有两段话我不太明白,请大家看看什么意思,谢谢啦!
1. Whilst we accept there are a limited number of ways to write about a given topics, we would have expected this previous publication to have been included in the references, if only to reduce the repetition that is evident in this manuscript regarding methods etc.
2. We would be grateful if you and your co-authors would consider whether this publication should have been included in the references, and make any changes necessary to the content as currently presented before re-submission to xxx.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zlyue

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
雨荷听秋: 金币+10 2014-02-08 13:15:34
1. Whilst we accept there are a limited number of ways to write about a given topics, we would have expected this previous publication to have been included in the references, if only to reduce the repetition that is evident in this manuscript regarding methods etc.
我们见到过这方面的一些研究,也期盼你已参考了之前发表的文章,且有新创。
2. We would be grateful if you and your co-authors would consider whether this publication should have been included in the references, and make any changes necessary to the content as currently presented before re-submission to xxx.
期盼你和其他作者能概括之前的结果,并在新的递交中呈现本文的创新点。
7楼2014-01-26 22:40:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 雨荷听秋 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见