|
[交流]
投JPCL 悲剧已有15人参与
JPCL 真 牛逼, 搞了四个审稿人,5天就给了结果, 不知道 letter类的还能投什么杂志 ?
Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. After careful consideration of their comments (and my own evaluation of the manuscript), I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters.
While your work appears to have been carried out with care, unfortunately, we are unable to accept all of the sound work submitted to the journal. We appreciate your choice of The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters as a possible forum for presentation of your work.
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: While the work is good and publishable, a more appropriate journal is recommended such as Computational Materials Science
Comments:
The considerations of adsorption on the surface of any metal oxide, including titanium dioxide, can help to understand the reactivity only is the framework is adequate to the real oxide systems, which are defected, i.e. include point defects. The related defect disorder is described in the literature. Owing to the ignorance of defect disorder, the obtained results are not adequate to the real systems. This work is probably of an interest of computational journals.
Additional Questions:
Urgency: Low
Significance: Moderate
Novelty: Low
Scholarly Presentation: Moderate
Is the paper likely to interest a substantial number of physical chemists, not just specialists working in the authors' area of research?: No
Reviewer: 2
Recommendation: This paper is probably publishable, but major revision is needed.
Additional Questions:
Urgency: Moderate
Significance: High
Novelty: Moderate
Scholarly Presentation: High
Is the paper likely to interest a substantial number of physical chemists, not just specialists working in the authors' area of research?: Yes
Reviewer: 3
Recommendation: This paper is not recommended because the material is not appropriate for The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters.
Additional Questions:
Urgency: Low
Significance: Low
Novelty: Low
Scholarly Presentation: Moderate
Is the paper likely to interest a substantial number of physical chemists, not just specialists working in the authors' area of research?: No
Reviewer: 4
Recommendation: This paper is publishable subject to minor revisions noted. Further review is not needed.
Additional Questions:
Urgency: High
Significance: Top 10%
Novelty: High
Scholarly Presentation: High
Is the paper likely to interest a substantial number of physical chemists, not just specialists working in the authors' area of research?: Yes |
» 猜你喜欢
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
|