| 查看: 545 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ，点击这里进行查看 | ||
blitzer铜虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
中翻英問題 請大家幫忙
|
|
|
?m?????Y????????OR???????????? ??????????????????????y??R??asymmetric ??R?hС?a??r?? ???????^??????x??y???f ???c1?cc2????С ?????y???w??stress factor??? ??F????system size?С?r??e???@ ??system size???r factor????o??? ??Y???c????????? ?x?x?????λ????ε????? ?м????M |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今年审到国自然15份，谈谈感受
已经有28人回复
-
投稿求助，期刊
已经有8人回复
-
光量子物理方向 博士招生 1人（2026.09）
已经有5人回复
-
河北省自然科学基金
已经有5人回复
-
献血感触
已经有13人回复
-
面上本子正文33页，违规吗？会被低分嘛？
已经有16人回复
-
国自然评分
已经有5人回复
-
国自然上会要求
已经有11人回复
-
提交了我也来说说感想
已经有10人回复
-
评审有感
已经有26人回复
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
blitzer: 金币+7, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案, 非常謝謝你的回答 2014-01-10 15:49:45
blitzer: 金币+7, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案, 非常謝謝你的回答 2014-01-10 15:49:45
|
Although the above results are obtained based on the assumption that R is constant, R is asymmetric in a real physical system. In the case of r much smaller than a, as the heat flow can be easily transferred from x to y, leading to a smaller discrepancy between c1 and c2, the stress factor of the whole system will be reduced. Such phenomenon tends to be particularly evident with reducing size of the system, while the factor remains almost constant in the case of very large-sized system. This result is consistent with preceding discussions. |
2楼2014-01-10 15:06:06
RXMCDM
版主 (文坛精英)
- 翻译EPI: 530
- 应助: 401 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 1.908
- 金币: 38947.6
- 散金: 4908
- 红花: 88
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 11453
- 在线: 1355.6小时
- 虫号: 2739168
- 注册: 2013-10-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 一般管理理论与研究方法论
- 管辖: 论文翻译
【答案】应助回帖
★
blitzer: 金币+1, ★有帮助, 謝謝回覆 2014-01-10 15:49:21
blitzer: 金币+1, ★有帮助, 謝謝回覆 2014-01-10 15:49:21
|
The foregoing results are based on the assumption that R is a constant which is in fact asymmetric in a real physical system . Heat transfer more easily from x to y when R is much smaller than a and discrepancy between c1 and c2 become so small that the system stress factor as a whole decreased . This phenomenon is particularly evident with smaller system size and with larger system size the factor do not change at all . This result is consistent with the previous discussion(s). |
3楼2014-01-10 15:30:33