24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

jjfengnju

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 6 (幼儿园)
金币: 3535.3
散金: 2354
红花: 23
帖子: 994
在线: 1827.7小时
虫号: 683572
注册: 2008-12-28
专业: 生物物理化学

[求助] RSC ADV因题目不合适，二审被拒.如何回复已有2人参与

第一次问题： do not show any "superior electrocatalytic activity" as demands in the manuscript. The higher current is because of the higher surface area, but no evidence of catalysis was observed. The catalysis is related with the change in the energetic of the activation state.
原题目 Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their superior electrocatalytic activity for formic acid oxidation
改为Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their high electrocatalytic activity for formic acid oxidation
二对这个问题不满意：还是这个问题
题目改为 Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their electrochemical properties
今天结果：拒稿。
The manuscript entitled "Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their high electrocatalytic activity for formic acid oxidation" (previous title) got some attentions for its results on electrocatalytic activity, which were wrongly projected in the previous manuscript and subsequently in its first revised version. After digging into that wrong projection, finally, the wrong "electrocatalytic activity" phenomenon is removed from the second revised manuscript entitled "Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their electrochemical properties". Now the work has lost its importance to the contemporary publications in the field and thus not acceptable for publication in International Journals.

计划改为：Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains with enhanced electrocatalytic performances 再提交。可以吗？

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

RSC Adv修改稿投出一月无消息，今天收到来信是不是需要再推荐审稿人？已经有25人回复
文章历时三年，多次被拒，终被RSC ADV接收，聊以记之，以飨虫友。已经有376人回复
RSC advances速度挺快的已经有18人回复
RSC Advances预计影响因子能有多少？已经有26人回复
投CC，后被主编转到RSC ADV，一周就返回了审稿意见，现在大修返回，under review中已经有13人回复
under review 状态下有可能是编辑审稿吗？还是外审？已经有12人回复

1楼 2013-12-24 16:58:45

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

绍敏郡主

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 289 (大学生)
金币: 1251.1
散金: 2196
红花: 41
帖子: 1575
在线: 1866.7小时
虫号: 2611526
注册: 2013-08-22
专业: 原子和分子物理

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1

审稿人认为你的催化活性没什么特别的，怎么改都没用

赞一下

回复此楼

2楼2013-12-24 17:01:45

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

googleuboy

木虫 (知名作家)

应助: 747 (博后)
金币: 3118.8
散金: 4149
红花: 36
帖子: 6906
在线: 760.6小时
虫号: 1810740
注册: 2012-05-11
性别: GG
专业: 结构工程

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jjfengnju: 金币+5 2013-12-24 18:38:32

do not show any "superior electrocatalytic activity" as demands in the manuscript. The higher current is because of the higher surface area, but no evidence of catalysis was observed. 才是原因，与你题目该不该关系不大。

赞一下

回复此楼

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU