应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » RSC ADV因题目不合适，二审被拒.如何回复
51/1返回列表
查看: 1048  |  回复: 7
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jjfengnju

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] RSC ADV因题目不合适，二审被拒.如何回复 已有2人参与

第一次问题 ： do not show any "superior electrocatalytic activity" as demands in the manuscript. The higher current is because of the higher surface area, but no evidence of catalysis was observed. The catalysis is related with the change in the energetic of the activation state.
原题目 Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their superior electrocatalytic activity for formic acid oxidation
改为Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their high electrocatalytic activity for formic acid oxidation
二对这个问题不满意：还是这个问题
题目改为 Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their electrochemical properties
今天结果：拒稿。
The manuscript entitled "Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their high electrocatalytic activity for formic acid oxidation" (previous title) got some attentions for its results on electrocatalytic activity, which were wrongly projected in the previous manuscript and subsequently in its first revised version. After digging into that wrong projection, finally, the wrong "electrocatalytic activity" phenomenon is removed from the second revised manuscript entitled "Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their electrochemical properties". Now the work has lost its importance to the contemporary publications in the field and thus not acceptable for publication in International Journals.

计划改为：Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains with enhanced electrocatalytic performances 再提交。可以吗？
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2013-12-24 16:58:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

raymon7805

银虫 (职业作家)
审稿人认为你的样品其实没什么催化活性，主要是样品较大的比表面积引起的！根本原因不在题目，而是高度达不到RSC Adv
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
坚持原则，踏实做事
8楼2013-12-24 20:00:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

绍敏郡主

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
审稿人认为你的催化活性没什么特别的，怎么改都没用
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2013-12-24 17:01:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

googleuboy

木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
jjfengnju: 金币+5 2013-12-24 18:38:32
do not show any "superior electrocatalytic activity" as demands in the manuscript. The higher current is because of the higher surface area, but no evidence of catalysis was observed. 才是原因，与你题目该不该关系不大。
赞一下 回复此楼
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
3楼2013-12-24 17:25:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jjfengnju

金虫 (正式写手)
已经删了呀，全改成 enhanced electrocatalytic performances了
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2013-12-24 18:38:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭