24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 392  |  回复: 1

jjfengnju

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 文章题目引起的悲剧!二审悲剧 RSC adv. 如何修改? 已有1人参与

第一次问题 : do not show any "superior electrocatalytic activity" as demands in the manuscript. The higher current is because of the higher surface area, but no evidence of catalysis was observed. The catalysis is related with the change in the energetic of the activation state.
原题目 Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their superior electrocatalytic activity for formic acid oxidation
改为Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their high electrocatalytic activity for formic acid oxidation
二对这个问题不满意:还是这个问题
题目改为 Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their electrochemical properties
今天结果:拒稿。
The manuscript entitled "Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their high electrocatalytic activity for formic acid oxidation" (previous title) got some attentions for its results on electrocatalytic activity, which were wrongly projected in the previous manuscript and subsequently in its first revised version. After digging into that wrong projection, finally, the wrong "electrocatalytic activity" phenomenon is removed from the second revised manuscript entitled "Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains and their electrochemical properties". Now the work has lost its importance to the contemporary publications in the field and thus not acceptable for publication in International Journals.

计划改为:Facile synthesis of Pd nanochains with enhanced electrocatalytic performances 再提交。可以吗?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

pengyingjing

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jjfengnju: 金币+10 2013-12-24 18:39:05
这个 审稿人不是说题目不适当的吧  应该是说你的催化效果不好   该题目改到啥时候他都不满意啊。换个杂质投投看,再投这个杂质还是遇到这个审稿人 还是一样悲剧啊
2楼2013-12-24 17:49:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jjfengnju 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见