24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1144  |  回复: 9
本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

RXMCDM

版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
wrathqust: 金币+5, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-01-03 10:03:44
The aim of this experiment was to study the effects of cereals and cereal by-products supplemented with non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) enzyme on nutrient utilization rates of meat ducks. A total of 56 healthy adult male meat Ma ducks with the body weight about 2.0 kg were randomly divided into 7 groups and 8 replicates in each group. Metabolic test was carried out by 'hunger strike-gavage method' to determine apparent and true utilization rates of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE) and crude fiber (CF) of 14 kinds of cereals and cereal by-products before and after adding NSP enzyme. The results showed that most of the 14 kinds of cereals and cereal by-products adding with NSP enzyme could improve the apparent and true utilization rates of DM, CP, EE and CF. Among them, the apparent utilization rates of DM, CP, EE and CF of corn were increased by 6.69% (P<0.01), 24.73% (P<0.05), 7.40% (P>0.05) and 9.95% (P<0.05), respectively; the apparent utilization rates of CP and CF of rice bran were increased by 14.20% and 4.55% (P>0.05), respectively; the apparent utilization rates of EE and CF of DDGS were increased by 12.57% and 4.99% (P>0.05), respectively; the apparent utilization rates of DM and CP of secondary flour were increased by 1.26% and 13.87% (P>0.05), respectively. NSP enzyme addition could make most of the cereals and cereal by-products release additional effective nutrients.
The effective nutrient improvement value (ENIV) range        
of DM was 0.09 to 46.92 g/kg, the ENIV range of CP was 0.49 to 9.55 g/kg, the ENIV range of EE was 0.13 to 8.85 g/kg and the ENIV range of CF was 0.31 to 7.78 g/kg. The results indicate that cereals and cereal by-products adding with NSP enzyme can improve the nutrient utilization rates of meat ducks in different extent.
有效营养改进值(effective nutrient improvement value,ENIV)为加酶后与加酶前的表观可利用养分值之差
根据7楼的 (还有另外一种考虑,就是指某改进仅限于单一变量,而不是改进多个。)
认为译为单(一)变量改进值∆RW,与原文更符合。为何用改进不用增加,实际应为变化,不一定是增加,减少也是可能的。物理学中improvement value 也有这种用法的!
10楼2013-12-22 21:20:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wrathqust 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见