应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 出国留学区 » 出国考试 » WSK考试 » 有没有牛人来讨论下答案呀？
201/2返回列表12下一页
查看: 2014  |  回复: 19
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

susu2008

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 有没有牛人来讨论下答案呀？ 已有8人参与

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼 2013-12-07 14:36:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

h1j2l3

木虫 (小有名气)
★ ★
benovence: 金币+2, 谢谢参与 2013-12-07 18:57:15
刚才有人分享阅读part B，我找了下，网址：http://www.douban.com/group/topic/14966352/

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下(3人) 回复此楼
4楼2013-12-07 15:13:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Lancelotjhy

金虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
12楼: Originally posted by 小猪头三 at 2013-12-07 16:07:45
这几个我全T...

腿没骨折…… 是桅杆折了吧？
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
HA
18楼2013-12-08 11:21:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

heemy1987

新虫 (初入文坛)
同求牛人分享听力答案
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2013-12-07 14:39:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

悠悠的土豆

铁虫 (初入文坛)
几个月没听听力上阵完全蒙了，而且现在出题老师太机智了，选择题我也猜不准了，哭。同求答案看运气

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2013-12-07 14:42:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

heemy1987

新虫 (初入文坛)
引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by h1j2l3 at 2013-12-07 15:13:28
刚才有人分享阅读part B，我找了下，网址：http://www.douban.com/group/topic/14966352/

竟然有原文，似乎填对了
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2013-12-07 15:27:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

susu2008

新虫 (初入文坛)
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by heemy1987 at 2013-12-07 15:27:11
竟然有原文，似乎填对了...

第一个空的答案是从哪里开始的？？我都记不清了。。。
赞一下 回复此楼
6楼2013-12-07 15:33:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

susu2008

新虫 (初入文坛)
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by heemy1987 at 2013-12-07 15:27:11
竟然有原文，似乎填对了...

我记得我头两个空填的是F A，是不是都错了？？
赞一下 回复此楼
7楼2013-12-07 15:40:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

heemy1987

新虫 (初入文坛)
There are as many definitions of philosophy as there are philosophers – perhaps there are even more. After three millennia of philosophical activity and disagreement, it is unlikely that we’ll reach consensus, and I certainly don’t want to add more hot air to the volcanic cloud of unknowing. What I’d like to do in the opening column in this new venture — The Stone — is to kick things off by asking a slightly different question: what is a philosopher?

As Alfred North Whitehead said, philosophy is a series of footnotes to Plato. Let me risk adding a footnote by looking at Plato’s provocative definition of the philosopher that appears in the middle of his dialogue, “Theaetetus,” in a passage that some scholars consider a “digression.” But far from being a footnote to a digression, I think this moment in Plato tells us something hugely important about what a philosopher is and what philosophy does.

Socrates tells the story of Thales, who was by some accounts the first philosopher. He was looking so intently at the stars that he fell into a well. Some witty Thracian servant girl is said to have made a joke at Thales’ expense — that in his eagerness to know what went on in the sky he was unaware of the things in front of him and at his feet. Socrates adds, in Seth Benardete’s translation, “The same jest suffices for all those who engage in philosophy.”

What is a philosopher, then? The answer is clear: a laughing stock, an absent-minded buffoon, the butt of countless jokes from Aristophanes’ “The Clouds” to Mel Brooks’s “History of the World, part one.” Whenever the philosopher is compelled to talk about the things at his feet, he gives not only the Thracian girl but the rest of the crowd a belly laugh. The philosopher’s clumsiness in worldly affairs makes him appear stupid or, “gives the impression of plain silliness.” We are left with a rather Monty Pythonesque definition of the philosopher: the one who is silly.

But as always with Plato, things are not necessarily as they first appear, and Socrates is the greatest of ironists. First, we should recall that Thales believed that water was the universal substance out of which all things were composed. Water was Thales’ philosophers’ stone, as it were. Therefore, by falling into a well, he inadvertently presses his basic philosophical claim.

But there is a deeper and more troubling layer of irony here that I would like to peel off more slowly. Socrates introduces the “digression” by making a distinction between the philosopher and the lawyer, or what Benardete nicely renders as the “pettifogger.” The lawyer is compelled to present a case in court and time is of the essence. In Greek legal proceedings, a strictly limited amount of time was allotted for the presentation of cases. Time was measured with a water clock or clepsydra, which literally steals time, as in the Greek kleptes, a thief or embezzler. The pettifogger, the jury, and by implication the whole society, live with the constant pressure of time. The water of time’s flow is constantly threatening to drown them.

The freedom of the philosopher consists in either moving freely from topic to topic or simply spending years returning to the same topic out of perplexity, fascination and curiosity.
By contrast, we might say, the philosopher is the person who has time or who takes time. Theodorus, Socrates’ interlocutor, introduces the “digression” with the words, “Aren’t we at leisure, Socrates?” The latter’s response is interesting. He says, “It appears we are.” As we know, in philosophy appearances can be deceptive.But the basic contrast here is that between the lawyer, who has no time, or for whom time is money, and the philosopher, who takes time. The freedom of the philosopher consists in either moving freely from topic to topic or simply spending years returning to the same topic out of perplexity, fascination and curiosity.

Pushing this a little further, we might say that to philosophize is to take your time, even when you have no time, when time is constantly pressing at your back. The busy readers of The New York Times will doubtless understand this sentiment.It is our hope that some of them will make the time to read The Stone. As Wittgenstein says, “This is how philosophers should salute each other: ‘Take your time.’ ” Indeed, it might tell you something about the nature of philosophical dialogue to confess that my attention was recently drawn to this passage from Theaetetus in leisurely discussions with a doctoral student at the New School, Charles Snyder.

Socrates says that those in the constant press of business, like lawyers, policy-makers, mortgage brokers and hedge fund managers, become ”bent and stunted” and they are compelled “to do crooked things.” The pettifogger is undoubtedly successful, wealthy and extraordinarily honey-tongued, but, Socrates adds, “small in his soul and shrewd and a shyster.” The philosopher, by contrast, is free by virtue of his or her otherworldliness, by their capacity to fall into wells and appear silly.
赞一下 回复此楼
8楼2013-12-07 15:43:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

susu2008

新虫 (初入文坛)
引用回帖:
8楼: Originally posted by heemy1987 at 2013-12-07 15:43:08
There are as many definitions of philosophy as there are philosophers – perhaps there are even more. After three millennia of philosophical activity and disagreement, it is unlikely that we’ll reac ...

好像给出的原文有错误，4和5有重复
赞一下 回复此楼
9楼2013-12-07 15:50:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

susu2008

新虫 (初入文坛)
The lawyer is compelled to present a case in court and time is of the essence. In Greek legal proceedings, a strictly limited amount of time was allotted for the presentation of cases. Time was measured with a water clock or clepsydra, which literally steals time, as in the Greek kleptes, a thief or embezzler. The pettifogger, the jury, and by implication the whole society, live with the constant pressure of time. The water of time’s flow is constantly threatening to drown them.

这段好像是选项
赞一下 回复此楼
10楼2013-12-07 15:54:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 susu2008 的主题更新
201/2返回列表12下一页
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭