|
|
[交流]
投稿IEICE,请问这个回复是大修的意思吗?
邮件的标题是[Notification of Rejection]
然后编辑是这样回复的:
<Associate Editor Comments>
As the reviewers commented, due to the lack of explanations, comparisons, and discussions, it seems to be difficult to understand the novelty and the effectiveness of the proposed method. Therefore, since the paper needs major revisions, we judged the paper as a reject. Please consider following reviewers comments to improve your paper.
请问是不是一点没戏了,还是说大修之后可以再投? |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
这样的filecode谁见过
已经有7人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制,评价高的钱多评价低的钱少,但是增加资助率
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|