24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 678  |  回复: 2

LQ2011虫虫

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] Electrochimica Acta审稿意见已回,请大家帮忙我分析一下改后重投中的可能性 已有1人参与

编辑意见如下:
Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received.  You will see that they are advising against publication of your work in a current form.  Therefore I must reject it.
The manuscript can be resubmitted to Electrochimica Acta (formally as a new submission) provided that it is significantly improved, largely rewritten and revised.
For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
个人感觉编辑语气很生硬,大家帮我分析一下改后重投还值不值得呀?
审稿人1的提了4个问题,是有关于实验机理和选择性方面的问题,比较专业
Reviewer #1: The present version is below standards of Electrochimica Acta.
审稿人2也是4个问题,其中一个是说参考文献poor,还列了很多他说必须加入的参考文献;一个问题是说语言必须improved,其他2个问题比较简单
Reviewer #2: The superiority of the proposed sensor is not established.  The manuscript cannot be published in the present form. Nevertheless, the authors should be allowed to resubmit their work. Specific criticisms are listed below.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

LQ2011虫虫

新虫 (初入文坛)

补充:而且编辑也没有说重投的时间限制,所以给我一种感觉就是完全的重投,这样的话是不是又会换审稿人? paper是10月初投的,12月4号回的意见,大概2个月
2楼2013-12-06 10:43:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qiulei1010

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

可以考虑重投,好好回答问题再重投!
一起努力!一起加油!期待明天会更好!
3楼2014-02-25 11:34:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 LQ2011虫虫 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见