| 查看: 2191 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
关于《MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING》
|
|||
|
小弟初次投稿，选择了投此期刊，编辑给了两个review的意见，大牛们帮忙看下这评价如何？算是大修还是小修？希望大么？ Reviewer #1: The authors may present a new issue and a topic but there is no clear description on what is a new approach or a new result. SPER (Self-propagating exothermic reaction) was already reported and there are many papers published on SPER as the authors described. For example the authors describe previously reported results and facts by referring literatures in Introduction. However, it is not clear what is new. On lines from 2 to 12 in page 4 the authors intend to describe what is new. But are Cu/Cu joints new? Cu/Cu joints seems to be not new. If they think they are new, they should explain that. On the other hand, SPER process using Al/Ni is not new. In lines from 2 to 5, "there are little work reporting the in-depth understanding of solder behaviour and the joinning mechanism of SPER process", but there is no description in lines from 6 to 12 on Page 4. As well as to revise the sentences in such a way the reasedrs can understand what is new, the authors revise the results and discussion on their experimental results. The expression on authors of References are lack coherence. It is better to see the authors guides of Microelectronic Engineering. Reviewer #2: A systematic work to show how SPER can be beneficial to improve Al/Ni multilayer films bonding. I think the material is good enough to get publish as is if the conclusions are based on statistical analysis. So I would recommend the authors add more data to be able to draw conclusion based on statistical analysis. Especially Fig 6 and 7 tell us that there are correlations between pressure/temperature and thickness. But it is hard to clearly address if 0.5MPa is the critical pressure or not without statistical analysis. Since beneficiary of this work would be package or BEOL engineers, a conclusion based on statistical analysis is extremely important. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
某top大学教授说“能够在市场中兑现的能力才是真能力”无比同意！
已经有13人回复
-
同一个分子，一条来自文献，一条来自AI——不告诉你答案，你会选哪条？
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 关于tissue engineering投稿
已经有10人回复
- 电子设计类、嵌入式开发类论文发表求助！
已经有9人回复
- Minerals Engineering 投稿咨询
已经有3人回复
- Minerals Engineering 投稿咨询
已经有3人回复
- 我给国外期刊文章的审稿结果和审稿意见
已经有178人回复
tower-eleven
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 11.6
- 帖子: 4
- 在线: 1.2小时
- 虫号: 2831558
- 注册: 2013-11-27
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 磁共振成像技术与造影剂
5楼2013-11-28 10:19:13
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
2楼2013-11-28 09:16:43
chuzhufei
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
中场魔术师
- SEPI: 5
- 应助: 105 (高中生)
- 贵宾: 0.001
- 金币: 5829.3
- 散金: 7481
- 红花: 30
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 2608
- 在线: 1857.6小时
- 虫号: 706214
- 注册: 2009-02-22
- 专业: 电路与系统
3楼2013-11-28 10:08:07
4楼2013-11-28 10:09:06
