24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3419  |  回复: 9

寻找光阴

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] sci投稿给了一审意见,被拒稿了,但是我觉得文章还行,想要申诉,该怎么处理?

REFEREE’S REPORT


Points for Evaluation of the paper

1. Is the paper of sufficient scientific interest and has originality in its technical content to merit publication.
No

2. If the paper is generally acceptable, are there any errors of fact, logic or interpretation which need correction(s)?

Although paper is not acceptable, it is worth to be mentioning that: litteral translation leads to misunderstanding in some sentences making them meaningless. Further, since paper is without any interpretation of the submitted experimental evidence, errors in facts are hardly possible to evident. (Figure 2 is only scientific evidence presented).

3. Is the paper well written and the presentation clear and concise? If not, which portions or parts including tables and figures, need deletion, recasting or condensation.

In spite of previous suggestions, paper has its own kind of presenting novelties in very specific proppant emerging field of interest, but overall impression leads to the suggestion that it should be submitted to journal which is more related to water and oil investigations, what is also obvious from the cited papers at the end, excluding the ref 32, 33 and 34.

4. (i) Have the authors cited the relevant literature?

With the knowledge of the reviewer this can not be evaluated.

(ii) Is there any cited document, which, in your opinion, is superfluous or irrelevant?

Many references are missing; any personal name mentioned needs exact reference.

5. Is the abstract sufficiently informative, concise, and clear?

Yes

6. Recommendation: Does the paper deserve to be published

(i) as it is
(ii) with minor modifications
(iii) with major modifications
(iv) rejected


Specific comments, if any:

-Sintering phenomenon is mentioned (page 5 second chapter), but unfortunately since it is widely used and of great scientific importance, the explanation of its fundamentals, origins and stages is hard to comprehend. Also figure 1. does not provide any help in understanding principals of pore grain relations. It is important since more advanced technique of core shell pore structure is mentioned in ch. 6.2.

[ Last edited by 寻找光阴 on 2013-11-24 at 08:47 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zh10246

铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
比较难,几乎没什么positive的评价,如果认为审稿人是外行,要求换审稿人,不然就换杂志吧
2楼2013-11-24 09:00:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jinwei331

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
申述的理由是什么?别折腾了,还是改投吧。
3楼2013-11-24 09:08:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

guxue

专家顾问 (知名作家)

学习使人进步

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
cqbpatriot: 金币+2, 感谢专家 2013-11-24 12:29:27
cqbpatriot: 专家考核 2013-11-24 12:29:54
一般情况下申诉是没用的,而且从审稿意见来看,也没有必要申诉了。还是修改后改投吧。
青出于蓝而胜于蓝
4楼2013-11-24 09:22:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huishishui

铜虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
直接改投吧,申诉也没用的。谁投稿都认为自己写的很不错,你写的很烂你会去投那个杂志?
5楼2013-11-25 11:53:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

淡淡1世界

银虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
楼主,还是另寻明主吧,申诉基本上是没有用的
6楼2013-11-25 12:44:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

妮妮18866

铜虫 (小有名气)

建议改投,可选择影响因子低一点的期刊,研究方向吻合的,有中国人投过发过较多的更好些。
7楼2013-11-25 12:58:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

oughouz

铁虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
一般情况下申诉是没用的,还是另寻明主吧
8楼2013-11-25 13:04:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

aboluo198331

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

没什么用,还是早日改投吧!
9楼2013-12-04 14:03:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xinbuqianjin

银虫 (初入文坛)

坚决改投,该杂志拉黑
10楼2014-03-07 07:50:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 寻找光阴 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +4 G6APbkg8SA6w 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 02:40 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急 +3 G6APbkg8SA6w 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-30 02:18 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 01:47 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[公派出国] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-08-30 01:45 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[考博] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-08-30 01:34 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[论文投稿] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 01:25 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +7 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 8/400 2026-08-30 01:14 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +16 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-30 00:59 by winsaint
[公派出国] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +4 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 5/250 2026-08-30 00:52 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[考研] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +7 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 10/500 2026-08-30 00:41 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +6 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-08-30 00:31 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +8 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 16/800 2026-08-29 20:45 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +7 process2012 2026-08-23 10/500 2026-08-26 19:23 by hmhminy
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 国合现在查不到了吗? +10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
信息提示
请填处理意见