| 查看: 2406 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
visualwood新虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
求助，投了 Electric Power Systems Research, 大修，不知道希望大不大。已有13人参与
|
||
|
Reviewer #1: In this paper, an equivalent model of micro-grid has been proposed. The proposed model is based on the detailed modeling of components. The proposed method has some potential. However, there are some deficiencies, as follows: 1- The model and its estimated parameters are dependent of the disturbance applied to the microgrid. Therefore, in order to present a general model for the microgrid, different and major disturbances should be applied and studied in the paper. My suggestion is the application of machine learning methods. 2- On page 6, we can read the following text: " The system frequency of the micro-grid is constant when the micro-grid is in grid-connected mode. So, with f ??1 pu, the model of the equivalent static component can be written as:". This is right for the bus connected to the gird, but what about the frequency variations of buses in the microgid. This point and its effect on the modeling should be considered and discussed.（孤岛运行的仿真建模） Reviewer #4: 1. The authors need in this work to solve several operational issues with the microgrid operating in grid and islanded mode using the proposed model. They presented the main frame of how the model could be designed to solve these issues. However, they didn't present a specific problem with a specific solution. 2. It is not clear how the proposed model will perform under fault conditions. 3. Provide enough information about the optimization procedure using PSO. The choice of PSO over other algorithms is not clear. Authors need to clearly define why this is the best suitable optimization paradigm. 4. Discuss how practical the proposed model is. Present how fast are the iterations, and how many iterations are needed for a solution convergence. Discuss issues related to algorithmic delays and/or problems, and their respective effect on the results. 5. Discuss how fast your control system reacts in the case of internal contingencies, and how efficient it is to deal with internal faults. 6. Include several case studies for different scenarios. And provide enough numerical data regarding the test scenarios. 7. Finally, have the authors considered the robustness of the proposed model and control scheme? This important issue should be addressed and demonstrated in the paper. 感觉需要修改的很多，不知道希望大不大！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
和导师撕破脸了
已经有31人回复
-
叠氮有机化合物
已经有13人回复
-
76批博后面上中标，小满贯！
已经有7人回复
-
2024 年国社科后期资助项目到什么阶段了？
已经有5人回复
-
24级双9硕钙钛矿材料方向求博导收留
已经有5人回复
-
随缘读博 一篇中科院一区Top 一篇中科院二区Top 两篇专利
已经有21人回复
-
研究光催化的，好中的三四区
已经有7人回复
-
海优出来了吗
已经有4人回复
-
NBS溴代
已经有9人回复
-
咨询一下，现在保研的学生动不动都是获了各种比赛奖，这些学生真的有科研能力吗？
已经有28人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大修，希望大不？？
已经有22人回复
- 论文被Reject and Resubmit，给了四个月的修改时间，不知道希望大不大
已经有52人回复
- 大家帮我看看审稿人的意见，需要大修，不知道希望大不
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
4楼2013-11-22 10:53:55
2楼2013-11-22 00:01:12
visualwood
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 90.7
- 散金: 500
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 448
- 在线: 81.6小时
- 虫号: 937294
- 注册: 2010-01-05
- 专业: 电力系统
3楼2013-11-22 08:56:47
5楼2013-11-25 08:22:59
100