24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2527  |  回复: 1

yfglion

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] IEEE TSP 小修疑问 已有1人参与

三个审稿人,两个是直接发表(A - Publish Unaltered),第三个人给的是小修(AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes)

小修意见如下:
The authors have made significant revisions to the manuscript, taking the comments of all reviewers very seriously. The answers to the comments and the changes to the manuscript are satisfactory. In general, the main advantage of the proposed scheme is。。。。
。。。。。
The authors have discussed all these drawbacks which makes the overall presentation of their proposed algorithm look fair.

Just one more note concerning the third point,,,这里说了一个问题

Otherwise, there are only a few remaining comments that are very minor in nature:下面就是一些格式问题了

说完这些,他又来了这么一句
Overall, these comments are considered to be minor and hence no additional review seems to be required.

我现在的疑问是:他提到的那个问题,如果展开说的话还比较复杂,我要如何把握这个度?还有,后面那句话说不用再审了,我是不是可以不用大篇幅解释了?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

p_happiness

新虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
TSP牛人你好。恭喜恭喜,基本要中了。只要态度端正基本肯定中。一篇TSP在哪个学校也够毕业了。
2楼2013-11-21 12:34:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yfglion 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见