| ²é¿´: 1365 | »Ø¸´: 12 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
aaa_dujiang½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÔõô»Ø¸´°¡£¿µÚÒ»´Î Çó´ó¼Ò°ï°ïæ
|
|
|
µÚÒ»´Î û¾Ñé Çó¸÷λ¿´¿´ÕâÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¿¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø¸´£¿£¿×öµÄÊǰü¸²²ÄÁÏ 1) what does the 3% perform like the uncoated? Is 2% the anomaly or 3%? 2) is the M on the surface as a series of dispersed nanocrystals (typically sitting on the highest activity sites) or a more uniform thin film coating? 3) I'd expect no change in rate capability - good plot (Fig 4) 4) is there a coating level where M appeared in the XRD patterns? |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
287Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
22408 344·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ »ªµç¼ÆËã»ú¼¼Êõ
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
289Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
317Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¹ãÎ÷´óѧ¼ÒÇÝÒÅ´«ÓýÖÖ¿ÎÌâ×é2026Äê˶ʿÕÐÉú£¨½ÓÊÕ¼ÆËã»úרҵµ÷¼Á£©
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ѧУÒѾÌá½»µ½NSFC£¬»¹ÄÜÐÞ¸ÄÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
08¹¤Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
281Çóµ÷¼Á£¨0805£©
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
265Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)
aaa_dujiang
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 890.5
- É¢½ð: 651
- ºì»¨: 18
- Ìû×Ó: 741
- ÔÚÏß: 365.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1290235
- ×¢²á: 2011-05-09
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
13Â¥2013-11-17 11:13:40
wangchh
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 4886.9
- É¢½ð: 232
- Ìû×Ó: 456
- ÔÚÏß: 147.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 438364
- ×¢²á: 2007-09-21
- רҵ: ´ß»¯»¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
aaa_dujiang: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2013-11-16 11:32:58
aaa_dujiang: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2013-11-16 11:40:53
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
aaa_dujiang: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2013-11-16 11:32:58
aaa_dujiang: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2013-11-16 11:40:53
|
ÎÒ²»ÊÇ×ö°ü¸²²ÄÁϵ쬵«ÊÇÉó¸åÒâ¼ûµ¹Êǻظ´ÁËÓÐһЩ¡£»ù±¾ÔÔò¾ÍÊÇ£¬Õë¶ÔÎÊÌâÒ»¶ÔÒ»£¬ÇÐĪÑÜÉúÐÂÎÊÌ⣬»Ø´ðÑÔ¼òÒâê࣬²»Çå³þ»òÕß²»ÖªµÀҪ˵Ã÷£¬ÇÐĪºýŪÉó¸åÈË£¬ËûÃǺܶàʱºò¿´¸ö̬¶È¡£ 1) what does the 3% perform like the uncoated? Is 2% the anomaly or 3%? ÄÇÄã¾Í»Ø´ðÊÇʲô¾ÍºÃ¡£ºóÃæÕâ¸öÄã¾Í¸æËßËû2%»¹ÊÇ3%¾ÍÐУ¬²»ÓýâÊÍÔÒò¡£ 2) is the M on the surface as a series of dispersed nanocrystals (typically sitting on the highest activity sites) or a more uniform thin film coating? ¾ÍÑ¡ÔñÒ»¸ö¾ÍÐУ¬Èç¹ûÁ½¸ö¶¼²»ÊÇ£¬¾Í˵Ã÷ÄãÈÏΪµÄÄǸö¡£ 3) I'd expect no change in rate capability - good plot (Fig 4) Õâ¸öºÃÏñÊÇÔÞͬÄãµÄfig4£¬ÈôÊÇ£¬Äã²»Óûشð£¬×î¶àд¸öthank you for your comment. 4) is there a coating level where M appeared in the XRD patterns? ÄãÖ»Òª»Ø´ðYes»òÕßNo¾ÍÐС£ |
3Â¥2013-11-12 11:03:53
aaa_dujiang
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 890.5
- É¢½ð: 651
- ºì»¨: 18
- Ìû×Ó: 741
- ÔÚÏß: 365.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1290235
- ×¢²á: 2011-05-09
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
4Â¥2013-11-12 13:16:06
tangzhonghua
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 16 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 4026.5
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 2050
- ÔÚÏß: 59.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1104338
- ×¢²á: 2010-09-20
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ºËÎïÀí

5Â¥2013-11-12 14:08:07













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥