24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3707  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

雨露晨滴

木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 文章直接被拒--materials science and engineering A 已有2人参与

等了4个月零7天,编辑说根据审稿人意见,直接reject了。本人第一次投该杂志,请问虫友们,一般收到这样的邮件用不用给编辑回信呢?邮件里只附带了一个审稿人的审稿意见,说了一些试验条件不够明确及图表格式上的问题,当然也说近五年的参考文献不多,结果及讨论不是很清楚,建议目前的稿件不发表。能否再修改一下,再请编辑给次机会呢?
Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #2: The paper presents an investigation on high temperature mechanical fatgue failure behavior of solder joint. The work is very interesting and good. The language is impressive and organisation of the paper is good. The work presented seems to be preliminary work and lacks many data enabling the reproduaction of the expeirments carried out. For example : it does not mention the period of fatigue test, nos. of samples tested and failure aftre how many cycle. The format of the manuscript is not in the standard MSEA format for tables and figures. Mechanical properties of chemical composition of the materials used need to be included. The references are not up-to-date. If we see the references for last five years, it has citation of 1 from 2011, 3 from 2009 and 1 from 2008. It needs to be updated. More clarity is needed in results and discussion part.

Hence, the paper suffers is not upto the standard of MSEA and hence, the recommendation is against the publication of this manuscript in the present form.
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

sci教程

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

桂sweet

新虫 (小有名气)

请问楼主焊点高温机械疲劳试验怎么做

发自小木虫IOS客户端
12楼2017-01-10 00:03:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 雨露晨滴 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见