| 查看: 182 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[资源]
Australian Medicines Handbook CD-ROM, July 2006 Edition
|
|||
![]() The philosophy of the AMH is to use the best available evidence to support prescribing and dispensing recommendations. The purpose of the AMH is two fold: To provide a readily accessible, concise, up-to-date source of independent drug information to facilitate effective, rational, safe and economical prescribing. To provide an educational tool for practitioners and students The AMH is structured as follows: Chapters Chapters Bring together treatment reviews and related drugs and drug classes. Nested documents keep common information together, enable comparisons and reduce repetition; cross references link relevant information. Practice points give tips and advice. Treatment Summarises evidence and clinical practice for a condition and gives context for drug treatment. Discusses and compares the role of different classes and individual drugs in treating the condition. Drug class Cross refers to Treatment(s). Provides information common to all members, eg mode of action, contraindications, adverse effects. Comparative information describes differences between class members. Drug monograph If a drug is a class member it cross refers to Class for essential information common to the group. If not in a class it may refer to Treatment(s). Contains specific information for individual drugs, eg dosage, indications and products. Appendices Include drug interactions, electrolytes, laboratory reference ranges and contact information. PW: gigapedia.org SN: AMH-8-925-7842 36MB iso file (CD-ROM) -> 10MB rar file. For more info, check on the publisher website: www.amh.net.au For more info: https://www.amh.net.au/index.php?page=product;id=159 http://rapidshare.com/files/75989838/123456789.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/76074575/eAMH2006jul.rar http://www.megaupload.com/?d=TLOWQBA6 [search]Australian Medicines Handbook[/search] |
» 猜你喜欢
为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果
已经有4人回复
基金中了
已经有15人回复
帮忙看看fileCode
已经有8人回复
小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊
已经有3人回复
FileCode能看出啥?
已经有15人回复
filecode
已经有8人回复
确定了,国自然21号放榜
已经有7人回复
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分?
已经有11人回复
关于代码变化问题,想知道的进来
已经有24人回复
静等基金结果
已经有16人回复











回复此楼