| 查看: 181 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
Australian Medicines Handbook CD-ROM, July 2006 Edition
|
||
![]() The philosophy of the AMH is to use the best available evidence to support prescribing and dispensing recommendations. The purpose of the AMH is two fold: To provide a readily accessible, concise, up-to-date source of independent drug information to facilitate effective, rational, safe and economical prescribing. To provide an educational tool for practitioners and students The AMH is structured as follows: Chapters Chapters Bring together treatment reviews and related drugs and drug classes. Nested documents keep common information together, enable comparisons and reduce repetition; cross references link relevant information. Practice points give tips and advice. Treatment Summarises evidence and clinical practice for a condition and gives context for drug treatment. Discusses and compares the role of different classes and individual drugs in treating the condition. Drug class Cross refers to Treatment(s). Provides information common to all members, eg mode of action, contraindications, adverse effects. Comparative information describes differences between class members. Drug monograph If a drug is a class member it cross refers to Class for essential information common to the group. If not in a class it may refer to Treatment(s). Contains specific information for individual drugs, eg dosage, indications and products. Appendices Include drug interactions, electrolytes, laboratory reference ranges and contact information. PW: gigapedia.org SN: AMH-8-925-7842 36MB iso file (CD-ROM) -> 10MB rar file. For more info, check on the publisher website: www.amh.net.au For more info: https://www.amh.net.au/index.php?page=product;id=159 http://rapidshare.com/files/75989838/123456789.rar http://rapidshare.com/files/76074575/eAMH2006jul.rar http://www.megaupload.com/?d=TLOWQBA6 [search]Australian Medicines Handbook[/search] |
» 猜你喜欢
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有19人回复
2026国自然放榜时间
已经有9人回复
这样的filecode谁见过
已经有22人回复
据悉今年马上要出结果了
已经有6人回复
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分?
已经有7人回复
面上项目filecode邪修
已经有7人回复
关于代码变化问题,想知道的进来
已经有22人回复
filecode与中标关系的预测
已经有5人回复
fileCode有新解读?
已经有18人回复
关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家
已经有7人回复











回复此楼
20