| 查看: 3613 | 回复: 28 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
又被拒了。。。 已有20人参与
|
|||
|
前面几次拒稿就不说了,上次回来以后自己修改了以后再投,昨天审稿意见回来了,其中一个貌似全盘否定,还有一位,意见有点怪怪的,是担心对我打击太大了,说得委婉一点吗?The impacts of the parameters in the ** scheme were found to be considerable, hence, these results are worthy of publication in peer-review journals. However, I find the author’s analysis to be rather weak, and their interpretations are sometimes wrong and should be corrected. It is also needed to reconstruct and edit the article – subsections in section 4 are not relevant to each other, and some of them can be eliminated. In editorial aspect, the authors have to check the manuscript guideline of MAP for units, citations, figures, and tables; figures need to be presented in a more organized and unified form. In summary, there are interesting results here but the analysis is currently too superficial to warrant publication in MAP, so I recommend major revisions. 求指点,求安慰 |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有123人回复
今天基金会出结果吗?20260819
已经有13人回复
时间戳变了,能看出什么问题?
已经有16人回复
filecode,4个jtjc了
已经有13人回复
为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低?主要原因有哪些?
已经有5人回复
今天放榜没戏了吧
已经有5人回复
今天放榜吗?
已经有15人回复
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有12人回复
2027广东省杰青
已经有10人回复
朋友圈看到的
已经有8人回复
16楼2013-11-08 20:17:46
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-

专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
2楼2013-11-04 17:18:00
3楼2013-11-04 17:19:18
makunjida
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1291 (讲师)
- 金币: 17869.3
- 散金: 481
- 红花: 38
- 帖子: 7547
- 在线: 399小时
- 虫号: 1578528
- 注册: 2012-01-15
- 专业: 计算机软件
4楼2013-11-04 17:22:32









回复此楼
米豆啦啦啦