| 查看: 3152 | 回复: 28 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
又被拒了。。。 已有20人参与
|
|||
|
前面几次拒稿就不说了，上次回来以后自己修改了以后再投，昨天审稿意见回来了，其中一个貌似全盘否定，还有一位，意见有点怪怪的，是担心对我打击太大了，说得委婉一点吗？The impacts of the parameters in the ** scheme were found to be considerable, hence, these results are worthy of publication in peer-review journals. However, I find the author’s analysis to be rather weak, and their interpretations are sometimes wrong and should be corrected. It is also needed to reconstruct and edit the article – subsections in section 4 are not relevant to each other, and some of them can be eliminated. In editorial aspect, the authors have to check the manuscript guideline of MAP for units, citations, figures, and tables; figures need to be presented in a more organized and unified form. In summary, there are interesting results here but the analysis is currently too superficial to warrant publication in MAP, so I recommend major revisions. 求指点，求安慰 |
回复此楼» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
米豆啦啦啦» 猜你喜欢
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有19人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有53人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有5人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
18楼2013-11-08 21:28:44
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555210
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2147
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
2楼2013-11-04 17:18:00
3楼2013-11-04 17:19:18
makunjida
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1291 (讲师)
- 金币: 18089.3
- 散金: 338
- 红花: 38
- 帖子: 7545
- 在线: 399小时
- 虫号: 1578528
- 注册: 2012-01-15
- 专业: 计算机软件
4楼2013-11-04 17:22:32