24СʱÈÈÃŰæ¿éÅÅÐаñ    

Znn3bq.jpeg
²é¿´: 4777  |  »Ø¸´: 9
µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû

lala1008

½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

¶à³îÉÆ¸Ð£¬èîæñ²»Ñ±£¬×ÔÇ¿²»Ï¢

[½»Á÷] Ͷ¸åEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing (SCI IF=1.05)µÄ¾­Àú ÒÑÓÐ7È˲ÎÓë

Ͷ¸åEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing (SCI IF=1.05)µÄ¾­Àú
(ת×Ô£ºhttp://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-208175-297323.html£©
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal ProcessingÆÚ¿¯µÄѧ¿Æ·¶³ëÊÇÐÅÏ¢À࣬ÂÛÎĵķ¶Î§½Ï¹ã·º£ºApplication areas include (but are not limited to): communications, networking, sensors and actuators, radar and sonar, medical imaging, biomedical applications, remote sensing, consumer electronics, computer vision, pattern recognition, robotics, fiber optic sensing/transducers, industrial automation, transportation£¬
     ¸ÃÆÚ¿¯ÓÉHindawi Publishing CorporationÀ´¸ºÔð³ö°æ£¬http://www.hindawi.com£¬¸ÃÆÚ¿¯SCIµÄÓ°ÏìÒò×Ó1.055 according to 2008 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters (ISI) in 2009.¡£
      µ«¸ÃÆÚ¿¯Õ⼸ÄêÓ°ÏìÒò×Ó¾ù²»µ«ÉÏÉý£¬±ÊÕßÔÚÍøÕ¾ÉϼìË÷ÁËһϣ¬¹úÄÚ¹ú·À¿Æ¼¼´óѧ£¬¶«ÄÏ´óѧ£¬Î÷±±¹¤Òµ´óѧµÈµ¥Î»¾ùÓÐ×÷ÕßÔÚ¸ÃÆÚ¿¯ÉÏ·¢¹ýÂÛÎÄ£¬ÎÒÓÚ2009Äê7Ôµ×Ͷ¸å£¬¸Ð¾õ±à¼­¶ÔÓÚ¸ñʽҪÇ󲻶࣬Éó¸åÖÜÆÚ´ó¸ÅÊÇ3¸ö°ëÔÂ×óÓÒ£¬ÎÒÓÚ2009Äê11ÔÂÊÕµ½ Éó¸åµÄÒâ¼û£¬±à¼­Ëµ£¬¹²ÓÐ3¸öÈËÉó¸å£¬Óжþ¸öreviewerµÄÒâ¼ûÒѾ­»ØÀ´ÁË£¬·¢¸øÎÒ£¬ÎÒ×Ðϸ¿´¹ýÉó¸åÒâ¼ûºó£¬·¢ÏÖÉó¸å½á¹ûÊDz»ÀíÏëµÄ£¬·Ç³£µÄ²»ÀíÏ룬
reviewer1¸ø³öÁËÔ¼3Ò³µÄÎÊÌ⣬²¢ÇÒÒªÇóÎÒ½«ËûδÄÜÕÒµ½µÄһƪÎÄÏ×·¢¸øËû£¬²¢¶ÔÓÚ·ÂÕæÀïÃæµÄ¶¨Á¿»¯·ÖÎöSNRµÄÊý¾ÝÏêϸÔٱȽϣ¬·ÂÕæ£¬×îºó¼¸¾ä»°ÌرðÑÏË࣬²»½ö½öÊÇmajor revisionµÄÎÊÌâ¡£
¡°************************  Section 5 is somewhat weak and requires some expansion. The second sentence of the first paragraph is not sufficiently justified by the paper. The claim that the XXX approach yields the best de-noising performance would have to be justified by a comparison of other approaches, and in this paper it has only been compared with the XXX processor for one of the three benchmark cases considered. The other two paragraphs do not make any claims about the performance relative to other methods. . I consider sections 4 and 5 to appear weaker than the rest of the paper. The overall recommendation was Review again after major changes; while I consider that some changes are required I am not sure whether they qualify as 'major', but they seem more than 'minor' which is the only other option. ¡±

ͬÑùreviewer 2 µÄÒâ¼ûÒ²²»ºÃ£¬
The manuscript needs a major revision to improve the standard of the English. It is very difficult to determine what the authors mean in certain respects, particularly with regard to the description of the XXX method, which does not appear to make any sense.
ͬʱËû»¹Ö¸³öÎÄÖеÄһЩ´íÎó£¬ÕæÊǺ¹ÑÕ
Section 3.2 - The description of the XXX de-noising scheme does not make sense. Equation 7 - what is L? Equation 8 - what is t'? Section 4 - what noise model is used for treating the surface noise? Section 4.1 - when the authors compare the XXX performance with different SNRs, they also use different XXX positions. It is therefore not possible to distinguish between the effects of the SNR and any variation in performance resulting from XX position.
×îºóҲûÓÐ˵Òâ¼û£¬Ö»ÊÇÈÃÎÒ×ÐϸÔÙÐ޸ġ£

ÊÕµ½ÕâÑùµÄÒâ¼û£¬×Ô¼ºÒ²¾õµÃÂÛÎÄÓÐÐí¶àµØ·½ÐèÒªÔÙÈÏÕæÐ޸쬻ù±¾Ò²Ã»ÓÐÓÂÆøÔÙÐ޸ĺóµÄÏë·¨ÁË¡£
´óÔ¼¹ýÁË2ÖÜ£¬ÎÒ×Ô¼ººÍÑо¿Éú£¬ÈÏÕæÌÖÂÛÁËһϷÂÕæ¹ý³ÌÖеÄÎÊÌ⣬°üÀ¨»·¾³²ÎÊýµÄÉèÖõȣ¬µ«Èç¹ûÐ޸ĵϰ£¬¹¤×÷Á¿»¹ÊǷdz£´óµÄ£¬09Äê11Ôµף¬ÓÖÅöµ½¿Æ¼¼²¿Ò»¸öÏîÄ¿µÄ¼Æ»®ÊéҪдÁË£¬ËùÒÔÌØ±ðæµ£¬ÂÛÎÄÐÞ¸ÄÕâ¼þʾÍÍ£ÏÂÀ´ÁË¡£
     µ½ÁË09Äê12ÔÂ1ºÅ±à¼­À´ÐÅ˵£¬ÔõôÎÒûÓиøËûÃǻظ´£¬Ëû×¼±¸ÔÙ¸øÄÇÁ½Î»×¨¼ÒÉóÎÒµÄÂÛÎÄ¡£¿´µ½±à¼­µÄÐÅ£¬¾õµÃ»¹ÊÇÓÐÏ£ÍûµÄ£¬ÓÚÊÇ¿ªÊ¼ÁËÐ޸ĵIJ¹³ä¹¤×÷£¬ÂÛÎÄÒ²´Ó10Ò³Ôö¼Óµ½ÁË16Ò³£¬ÐÁ¿à¹¤×÷ÁË18Ì죬
ÓÚ12ÔÂ19ºÅÍíÉÏÌá½»ÁËÐ޸ĸ塣
  ÓÚÊÇÂú»³ÐÅÐĵĵȱ༭µÄÒâ¼û£¬ÕâÒ»´Î±à¼­»Ø¸´·Ç³£¿ì£¬Ô¼¹ýÁË10Ì죬±à¼­¾Í»Ø¸´£¬ÓÖ½Óµ½ÄÇÁ½Î»Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£¬´ò¿ªÒ»¿´£¬Òâ¼û¾¹È»Óַdz£¶à£¬ÌرðÊÇreviewer1˵£¬ÎªºÎÉÃ×ÔÔÚÎÄÖÐÔö¼ÓÁËһЩ¸ù±¾²»Ïà¹ØµÄ·ÂÕæÍ¼Æ¬ºÍ²»Ì«Ïà¹ØµÄÄÚÈÝ£¬¶øÇÒÕâЩÄÚÈݺÍÖ÷ÌâûÓÐÄÚÔڵĹØÁªÐÔ£¬ÒªÇóÎÒÂíÉÏɾ³ý(µ«ÎÒ²¢²»ÈÏͬËûµÄ¹Ûµã)£¬¶øÇÒ°´ËûµÄÒªÇó²¹³äÄÚÈÝ£¬1£¬2£¬3µÈ£¬£¬½áÂÛÊÇMAJOR REVISION!
reviewer2Õâ´ÎÒâ¼û²»´í£¬´óÒâÊÇ˵ÎÒÒѾ­°´ÕÕËûµÄÒªÇóÐÞ¸ÄÁË£¬µ«±ØÐë½â¾öÒ»¸öÎÊÌ⣬ӢÎIJ»Á÷Àû£¬²¿·ÖµØ·½¿´²»¶®£¬£¬£¬¡°The revised manuscript could still benefit from the attentions of a competent Enlish-speaking editor. The primary weakness of this paper remains the fact that results of simulations with different XXX positions are compared to infer the influence of signal-to-noise ratio. It therefore remains impossibile to separate the effects of SNR and true source range. ¡±Òâ¼û minor revision.

ÓÚÊÇÓÖ¿ªÊ¼ÁËÐ޸쬴óÔ¼ÓÚ2010Äê1ÔÂ15ºÅÔÙ´ÎÌá½»Ð޸İ汾£¬
9Ììºó£¬2010Äê1ÔÂ24ºÅ£¬ÊÕµ½±à¼­µÄÀ´ÐÅ£¬reviewer 1µÄÒâ¼û£¬ÈÔÈ»ÊÇÒªÎÒÔÙÐÞ¸Äһϣ¬µ«ÒѾ­²¢Îªminor revision£¬
Ö»µÃÔÙ´ÎÐ޸ģ¬ÓÚ2010Äê2ÔÂ10ºÅÌá½»Ð޸İ档

    ×îÖձ༭ÓÚ2010Äê2ÔÂ24ÈÕ£¬·¢À´ÐÅ˵ÂÛÎÄAccepted.µ«ÈÔȻҪÇóÎÒÕÒһλӢÓïºÃµÄÈË£¬°ïÎÒÔÙ´ÎÐÞ¸ÄÒ»ÏÂÂÛÎÄ¡£
    ÕâÊÇÎÒͶ¸å¸ÃÆÚ¿¯µÄ¾­Àú£¬¸Ð¾õËäȻдÁ˲»ÉÙÓ¢ ÎÄÂÛÎÄ£¬µ«ÈÔȻӢÓïˮƽҪ²»¶ÏÌá¸ß²ÅÐÐѽ£¡¶Ô×Ô¼ºµÄÂÛÎÄ»¹ÊÇÒªÈÏÕæ£¬ÔÙÈÏÕæ£¡
   ¸Õ²Î¼ÓÁËIEEEЭ»á£¬½ÉÄÉÁË69.5ÃÀÔªµÄÄê·Ñ£¬Ï´ÎͶ¸åÂÛÎĵÄÄ¿±êÊÇIIEEE Transactions on GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING (¸ÃÂÛÎĵÄÓ°ÏìÒò×Ó3.4)£¬2010ÄêµÄÄ¿±êÊÇÄÜÖÐһƪ IEEEransactions on GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING »òÕß IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS £¨Ó°ÏìÒò×Ó1.6×óÓÒ£©
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼­ÍƼö

Ðźż°Í¼Ïñ´¦ÀíÆÚ¿¯

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:

Éú»îÖеķܶ·£¬·Ü¶·ÖеÄÉú»î
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

zhengli102

½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

ûÓÐÍ·ÏÎ

¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Õâô²Ò£¬ÎÒ»¹ÏëÍ¶ÄØ¡£
ÔøÃÎÏëÕ̽£×ßÌìÑÄ
10Â¥2014-10-20 15:37:25
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
²é¿´È«²¿ 10 ¸ö»Ø´ð

yishuipang

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)

¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Ï´ÎͶ¸åÂÛÎĵÄÄ¿±êÊÇIIEEE Transactions on GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING (¸ÃÂÛÎĵÄÓ°ÏìÒò×Ó3.4)£¬2010ÄêµÄÄ¿±êÊÇÄÜÖÐһƪ IEEEransactions on GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING »òÕß IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS £¨Ó°ÏìÒò×Ó1.6×óÓÒ£©
-----------------------2010ÄêµÄÄ¿±êÍê³ÉÁËÂð£¿
VIP:VInterestingPaper
2Â¥2013-10-28 16:14:39
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

ppc

ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Õâ²»ÊÇÒ»¸ö²©¿ÍµÄÎÄÕÂô

[ ·¢×ÔÊÖ»ú°æ http://muchong.com/3g ]
3Â¥2013-10-28 16:54:56
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

lala1008

½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

¶à³îÉÆ¸Ð£¬èîæñ²»Ñ±£¬×ÔÇ¿²»Ï¢

ÒýÓûØÌû:
3Â¥: Originally posted by ppc at 2013-10-28 16:54:56
Õâ²»ÊÇÒ»¸ö²©¿ÍµÄÎÄÕÂô

Ͷ¸åEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing (SCI IF=1.05)µÄ¾­Àú
(ת×Ô£ºhttp://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-208175-297323.html£©
Éú»îÖеķܶ·£¬·Ü¶·ÖеÄÉú»î
4Â¥2013-10-29 08:40:24
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¹þ¹¤´ó 085600 277 12²Ä¿Æ»ùÇóµ÷¼Á 5+5 chenny174 2026-04-10 31/1550 2026-04-12 19:23 by qingfeng258
[¿¼ÑÐ] 296Çóµ÷¼Á +14 Íô£¡£¿£¡ 2026-04-10 16/800 2026-04-12 10:48 by zhouyuwinner
[¿¼ÑÐ] 22408µ÷¼Á315·Ö +3 zhuangyan123 2026-04-09 3/150 2026-04-12 00:25 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +18 MAXâê㯠2026-04-09 20/1000 2026-04-11 23:31 by zhen¡«
[¿¼ÑÐ] 290Çóµ÷¼Á +13 luoziheng 2026-04-10 13/650 2026-04-11 23:15 by labixiaoqiao
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ïôó0856£¬306Çóµ÷¼Á +15 Bblinging 2026-04-11 15/750 2026-04-11 22:53 by 314126402
[¿¼ÑÐ] 296Çóµ÷¼Á +8 Íô£¡£¿£¡ 2026-04-09 8/400 2026-04-11 21:02 by ÄæË®³Ë·ç
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +11 ôæôæÒ»ÊéÉú 2026-04-09 11/550 2026-04-11 19:57 by ÄæË®³Ë·ç
[¿¼ÑÐ] 11408¡£358Çóµ÷¼Á +3 TMYzds 2026-04-07 3/150 2026-04-11 17:10 by µªÆøÆøÆø
[¿¼ÑÐ] µ÷¼Á +5 ÎĵÀÐÇ̨ 2026-04-11 5/250 2026-04-11 15:01 by ¿­¿­Òª±ä˧
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085500Çóµ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏ +10 Ò×11122 2026-04-09 10/500 2026-04-11 10:39 by maddjdld
[¿¼ÑÐ] 288Çóµ÷¼Á +15 ´úfish 2026-04-09 16/800 2026-04-11 10:26 by wwj2530616
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0854µ÷¼Á +8 950824he@ 2026-04-09 8/400 2026-04-11 10:11 by zhq0425
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏÀà284µ÷¼Á +40 Ïë»»ÊÖ»ú²»Ïë½âÊ 2026-04-08 48/2400 2026-04-10 23:28 by 314126402
[²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì] ²ÄÁϵ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö +8 µ°¸âx2 2026-04-07 8/400 2026-04-10 23:13 by Ftglcn90
[¿¼ÑÐ] 314Çóµ÷¼Á +18 xhhdjdjsjks 2026-04-09 19/950 2026-04-10 18:53 by HPUCZ
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÕÐÊÕÓлú»¯Ñ§¡¢»¯¹¤£¬Ò©Ñ§£¬Ê³Æ·µÆ×¨ÒµÑ§Éú +3 yrfhjgdj 2026-04-08 3/150 2026-04-09 10:15 by QYQX_123
[¿¼ÑÐ] 265Çóµ÷¼Á +19 Сľ³æ085600 2026-04-06 21/1050 2026-04-08 10:38 by ÄæË®³Ë·ç
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085602µ÷¼Á ³õÊÔ×Ü·Ö335 +3 19123253302 2026-04-06 3/150 2026-04-07 18:00 by jp9609
[¿¼ÑÐ] 333Çóµ÷¼Á +6 ºÏ³ËÑîϰϦ 2026-04-06 6/300 2026-04-07 09:44 by Öí»á·É
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û