| 查看: 2686 | 回复: 18 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
编辑如此回复，希望多大呀？
|
|||
|
各位虫友： 大家好。首次投稿，不太清楚编辑这么回复，到底有多大希望。大家能帮我分析分析么。附上decision letter。 Your manuscript, has now been reviewed by two consultants who are highly knowledgeable in the area of this research. The reviews are enclosed for your information. As you will see from their comments, the reviewers believe that you are addressing an interesting topic and that your findings are of potential interest. That said, the reviewers raise a number of important issues about the argument you have presented. On the basis of these thoughtful and knowledgeable reviews, I have decided that I must reject this manuscript for publication. However, I would be willing to consider a revision if you believe you can effectively address the concerns. Because the detailed reviews are enclosed, I will not go over all of the concerns. However, the most important would appear to be the following. First, ……Second, ……. Third,……. Finally, ……. At this time I cannot be certain whether or not a revision will be successful, and thus if you do decide to revise and resubmit, you should do so with the knowledge that I cannot guarantee an acceptance. If you do decide to revise and resubmit, I would appreciate a brief cover letter explaining on a point-by-point basis how you have addressed each of the reviewers' comments. In addition, please be sure to prepare the manuscript in accord with APA style. I would like to have the manuscript returned within three months. If you anticipate being delayed considerably beyond that time, I would appreciate a note about when to expect the paper so that we can keep the files open. Please let me know via email within the next 2 weeks if you plan to undertake the revision.For your information, I anticipate returning any revision to the original reviewers for further consultation. Whatever course of action you decide to follow, I hope that you find the reviewers' comments useful to you as you continue your work in this area. Please note that if your submission (or a later revision of it) is accepted for publication, it cannot go into production until theOffice receives a signed copyright formfrom each author. Planning ahead to meet this requirement is especially important for manuscripts that have many authors. 编辑这么回复，重投后被接受的希望大吗？当然，我也知道应该按照审稿人的意见好好回复什么的。 祝好，谢谢各位啊。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
课题组招2027级博士 上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造方向
已经有4人回复
-
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有8人回复
-
上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生
已经有3人回复
-
实名举报：华南理工大学物理与光电学院副院长李志远婚内两次出轨女学生（博士）
已经有16人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组｜2027级博士研究生招生公告
已经有11人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组招收博士研究生
已经有10人回复
-
申博发邮件
已经有11人回复
-
各位大神，目前国内有哪些比较好用的逆合成软件？
已经有12人回复
-
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复
-
国社科系统bug了，是不是要放榜了？
已经有9人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 导师回复了，看有无希望
已经有16人回复
- 请问博导这样回复是否还有希望？我是跨专业学生
已经有3人回复
- 调剂--老师回复可以加入调剂队列什么意思？ 可以这次多大希望？
已经有3人回复
- 大家帮忙看看，编辑这样的回复文章还有戏吗？
已经有18人回复
- 导师的回复，说明我有希望么
已经有14人回复
- 外导这样回复,有希望吗
已经有7人回复
- 本人投的natural product research编辑这样回复，修改后有希望中吗？
已经有14人回复
- 编辑这样的回复，录用的概率多大？
已经有8人回复
- 这个appoinment如何回复
已经有8人回复
- 【求助】导师这样给的回复还有希望吗？另有报考河海的吗，都来露个头。
已经有15人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
……………………………… 
12楼2013-10-24 07:03:42
2楼2013-10-23 14:43:36
4楼2013-10-23 14:58:16
5楼2013-10-23 15:27:46